二亚胺
苝
材料科学
聚合物
聚合物太阳能电池
带隙
光电子学
高分子化学
化学
有机化学
复合材料
分子
作者
Tengling Ye,Shan Jin,Cong Kang,Changhao Tian,Xin Zhang,Chuanlang Zhan,Shirong Lu,Zhipeng Kan
标识
DOI:10.3389/fchem.2018.00613
摘要
Perylene diimide (PDI) derivatives as a kind of promising non-fullerene-based acceptor (NFA) have got rapid development. However, most of the relevant developmental work has focused on synthesizing novel PDI-based structures, and few paid attentions to the selection of the polymer donor in PDI-based solar cells. Wide bandgap polymer (PBDB-T) and narrow bandgap polymer (PBDTTT-EFT) are known as the most efficient polymer donors in polymer solar cells (PSCs). While PBDB-T is in favor with non-fullerene acceptors achieving power conversion efficiency (PCE) more than 12%, PBDTTT-EFT is one of the best electron donors with fullerene acceptors with PCE up to 10%. Despite the different absorption profiles, the working principle of these benchmark polymer donors with a same electron acceptor, specially PDI-based acceptors, was rarely compared. To this end, we used PBDB-T and PBDTTT-EFT as the electron donors, and 1,1'-bis(2-methoxyethoxyl)-7,7'-(2,5-thienyl) bis-PDI (Bis-PDI-T-EG) as the electron acceptor to fabricate PSCs, and systematically compared their differences in device performance, carrier mobility, recombination mechanism, and film morphology.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI