Efficacy of an Online Curriculum for Perioperative Goals of Care and Code Status Discussions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 随机对照试验 课程 印为红字的 等级间信度 麻醉学 医学教育 客观结构化临床检查 阅读(过程) 麻醉 心理学 外科 数学教育 教育学 政治学 评定量表 发展心理学 法学
作者
Amy Robertson,Leslie C. Fowler,Thomas S. Kimball,Jonathan A. Niconchuk,Michael Kreger,Ethan Y. Brovman,Elizabeth Rickerson,Nicholas Sadovnikoff,David L. Hepner,Matthew D. McEvoy,Angela M. Bader,Richard D. Urman
出处
期刊:Anesthesia & Analgesia [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:132 (6): 1738-1747 被引量:11
标识
DOI:10.1213/ane.0000000000005548
摘要

BACKGROUND: Preoperative goals of care (GOC) and code status (CS) discussions are important in achieving an in-depth understanding of the patient's care goals in the setting of a serious illness, enabling the clinician to ensure patient autonomy and shared decision making. Past studies have shown that anesthesiologists are not formally trained in leading these discussions and may lack the necessary skill set. We created an innovative online video curriculum designed to teach these skills. This curriculum was compared to a traditional method of learning from reading the medical literature. METHODS: In this bi-institutional randomized controlled trial at 2 major academic medical centers, 60 anesthesiology trainees were randomized to receive the educational content in 1 of 2 formats: (1) the novel video curriculum (video group) or (2) journal articles (reading group). Thirty residents were assigned to the experimental video curriculum group, and 30 were assigned to the reading group. The content incorporated into the 2 formats focused on general preoperative evaluation of patients and communication strategies pertaining to GOC and CS discussions. Residents in both groups underwent a pre- and postintervention objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with standardized patients. Both OSCEs were scored using the same 24-point rubric. Score changes between the 2 OSCEs were examined using linear regression, and interrater reliability was assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Residents receiving the video curriculum performed significantly better overall on the OSCE encounter, with a mean score of 4.19 compared to 3.79 in the reading group. The video curriculum group also demonstrated statistically significant increased scores on 8 of 24 rubric categories when compared to the reading group. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel video curriculum led to significant increases in resident performance during simulated GOC discussions and modest increases during CS discussions. Further development and refinement of this curriculum are warranted.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
追寻怀亦发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
Hello应助l林采纳,获得10
2秒前
小蘑菇应助hulahula采纳,获得10
2秒前
754753044发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Ava应助toppkj采纳,获得10
3秒前
cdercder应助清脆采纳,获得10
4秒前
zzh完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
在水一方应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
cdercder应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
刺猬完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
Wangdake2333应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
NexusExplorer应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
深情安青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
Nexus应助科研通管家采纳,获得50
7秒前
molihuakai应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
今后应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
aajhajkahna应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
礼貌吗发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
海阔天空q完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
星辰大海应助白舟采纳,获得10
8秒前
一去应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Zurich完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
科研通AI6.2应助月月采纳,获得10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
A Psychological Understanding of Criticism and Mental Health 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7752563
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9299641
关于积分的说明 20253191
捐赠科研通 7334817
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3310295
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2461612
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2323083