[Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal polyps with a novel plasma radio frequency generator and a disposable mucosal incision knife: A prospective, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled clinical trial].

内镜黏膜下剥离术 医学 随机对照试验 外科 粘膜切除术 解剖(医学) 临床试验 内窥镜检查 内科学
作者
Bo Song,Gang Shi,Xiaoyuan Xu,J X Xu,Feng Li,Jinge Xu,Ping-Hong Zhou,Ming‐Yan Cai
出处
期刊:PubMed [National Institutes of Health]
卷期号:28 (4): 384-391
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20241025-00353
摘要

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new plasma radiofrequency generator and a disposable mucosal incision knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastrointestinal lesions. Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized, non-inferiority multicenter study (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry No.: ChiCTR2000041394). The inclusion criteria for cases are as follows: (1) being able to understand and voluntarily participate in this clinical trial, and voluntarily signing the informed consent form; (2) being 18-70 years old, regardless of gender; (3) having a gastrointestinal lesion and meeting the endoscopic treatment conditions for the indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The exclusion criteria are: (1) meeting the contraindications for ESD; (2) having a surgical contraindication due to coagulation dysfunction or still taking anticoagulants 1 week before surgery; (3) having coagulation dysfunction, that is, the prothrombin time is prolonged by more than 3 seconds (more than 5 seconds in patients with liver disease), or the activated partial thromboplastin time is prolonged by more than 10 seconds, and the platelet count is < 70×10⁹/L; (4) having severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency and being unable to tolerate the surgery; (5) being a reproductive-aged woman with a positive blood or urine pregnancy test or a lactating woman; (6) the investigator deems that there are other factors that are not suitable for inclusion or affect the subject's participation. Patients who underwent ESD treatment for gastrointestinal lesions from March 2019 to April 2023 at the Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, the Department of Gastroenterology of Minhang District Central Hospital in Shanghai, and the Department of Gastroenterology of Quzhou People's Hospital were prospectively included. The experimental group used a new plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and a disposable mucosal incision knife, while the control group used a high-frequency electrosurgical system and a disposable mucosal incision knife. The primary efficacy indicator was the en bloc resection success rate, the secondary efficacy indicators included the coagulation success rate, and the operation stability of the plasma radiofrequency therapy instrument and the disposable mucosal incision knife; the safety indicators included the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, intraoperative perforation, and postoperative complications. Results: The study cohort comprised 194 patients, 95 in the experimental group and 99 in the control group. Analysis of the full set showed rates of en bloc resection of 97.89% (93/95) and 96.97% (96/99) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.53% (-5.58%, 6.64%). Analysis of the compliance set showed rates of en bloc resection of 97.83% (90/92) and 96.88% (93/96) in the experimental and control groups, respectively; the difference being 0.58% (-5.79%, 6.94%). These data indicate that the rate of en bloc resection in the experimental group using plasma radiofrequency therapy and disposable mucosal incision was not inferior to that of the control group. The rates of achieving intraoperative coagulation in the experimental and control groups were 7.14% (5/70) and 5.97% (4/67), respectively; this difference is not statistically significant (P=1.000). The control group had a significantly better rate of using the same instruments throughout the procedure than did the experimental group (P<0.001). In the safety analysis set, the incidences of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups (both P>0.05). Conclusion: Plasma radiofrequency therapy equipment and a disposable mucosal incision knife are safe and effective instruments for performing ESD of gastrointestinal lesions.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
体贴的尔阳完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小白做科研完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
zcbbcz完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
英姑应助renxiaoting采纳,获得10
2秒前
王君完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
充电宝应助陌路采纳,获得10
2秒前
强健的芸遥完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
MMM发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Antonio发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
orixero应助Ceno采纳,获得10
4秒前
一朵小鲜花儿完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
啦啦发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
NNN发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
野猪佩奇发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
乂领域发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
xy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
苏奇发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
coisini给coisini的求助进行了留言
6秒前
科研通AI6.2应助晨晨学长采纳,获得10
6秒前
王君发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
充电宝应助王锐采纳,获得10
6秒前
Amy完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Akim应助小晴子采纳,获得10
7秒前
黑桃Q发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Akim应助懒大王采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
负责的乌完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
酷波er应助lxh采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Miracle完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
Ava应助1q采纳,获得10
9秒前
PJT-8450完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
2016 Venous Blood Study (VBS) (Final V3.0) 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
The Effective Clinical Neurologist 3ed 500
The Great Hymn to Šamaš 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7702813
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9261225
关于积分的说明 20030960
捐赠科研通 7278339
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3294297
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2449697
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2300961