医学
内科学
心脏病学
心肌梗塞
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
靶病变
依维莫司
临床终点
优势比
支架
随机对照试验
作者
Masanori Taniwaki,Jonas Dominik Häner,Ryota Kakizaki,Yohei Ohno,Kazuyuki Yahagi,Yoshiharu Higuchi,George C.M. Siontis,Kenji Ando,Stefan Stortecky,Nobuaki Suzuki,Laura Morf,Naoki Watanabe,Jonas Lanz,Yasushi Ueki,Tatsuhiko Otsuka,Flavio Giuseppe Biccirè,Masami Sakurada,Sylvain Losdat,Lorenz Räber
标识
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae589
摘要
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Neoatherosclerosis is a leading cause of late (>1 year) stent failure following drug-eluting stent implantation. The role of biodegradable (BP) vs. durable polymer (DP) drug-eluting stents on long-term occurrence of neoatherosclerosis remains unclear. Superiority of biodegradable against durable polymer current generation thin-strut everolimus-eluting stent (EES) was tested by assessing the frequency of neoatherosclerosis 3 years after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: The randomized controlled, multicentre (Japan and Switzerland) CONNECT trial (NCT03440801) randomly (1:1) assigned 239 STEMI patients to pPCI with BP-EES or DP-EES. The primary endpoint was the frequency of neoatherosclerosis assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at 3 years. Neoatherosclerosis was defined as fibroatheroma or fibrocalcific plaque or macrophage accumulation within the neointima. RESULTS: Among 239 STEMI patients randomized, 236 received pPCI with stent implantation (119 BP-EES; 117 DP-EES). A total of 178 patients (75%; 88 in the BP-EES group and 90 in the DP-EES group) underwent OCT assessment at 3 years. Neoatherosclerosis did not differ between the BP-EES (11.4%) and DP-EES (13.3%; odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.33-2.04, P = .69). There were no differences in the frequency of fibroatheroma (BP-EES 9.1% vs. DP-EES 11.1%, P = .66) or macrophage accumulation (BP-EES 4.5% vs. DP-EES 3.3%, P = .68), and no fibrocalcific neoatherosclerosis was observed. Rates of target lesion failure did not differ between groups (BP-EES 5.9% vs. DP-EES 6.0%, P = .97). CONCLUSIONS: The use of BP-EES for primary PCI in patients presenting with STEMI was not superior to DP-EES regarding frequency of neoatherosclerosis at 3 years.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI