医学
替罗非班
改良兰金量表
安慰剂
冲程(发动机)
随机对照试验
优势比
麻醉
入射(几何)
闭塞
内科学
外科
缺血
心肌梗塞
缺血性中风
机械工程
替代医学
病理
工程类
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
物理
光学
作者
RESCUE BT Trial Investigators,Jie Shuai,Zili Gong,Li Huang,Juan Liu,Kun Tang,Zhenhui Duan,Houjie Ni,Yumin Liu,Fei Xie,Dongrun Yan,Songsheng Ye,Zhiquan Zhang,Zhihua Cao,Xianjin Shang,Xianhui Ding,Xiangjun Xu,Li Chen,Jiachuan Wu,Renliang Meng
出处
期刊:JAMA
[American Medical Association]
日期:2022-08-09
卷期号:328 (6): 543-543
被引量:196
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2022.12584
摘要
Importance: Tirofiban is a highly selective nonpeptide antagonist of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which reversibly inhibits platelet aggregation. It remains uncertain whether intravenous tirofiban is effective to improve functional outcomes for patients with large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. Objective: To assess the efficacy and adverse events of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. Design, Setting, and Participants: This investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was implemented at 55 hospitals in China, enrolling 948 patients with stroke and proximal intracranial large vessel occlusion presenting within 24 hours of time last known well. Recruitment took place between October 10, 2018, and October 31, 2021, with final follow-up on January 15, 2022. Interventions: Participants received intravenous tirofiban (n = 463) or placebo (n = 485) prior to endovascular thrombectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was disability level at 90 days as measured by overall distribution of the modified Rankin Scale scores from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). The primary safety outcome was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Results: Among 948 patients randomized (mean age, 67 years; 391 [41.2%] women), 948 (100%) completed the trial. The median (IQR) 90-day modified Rankin Scale score in the tirofiban group vs placebo group was 3 (1-4) vs 3 (1-4). The adjusted common odds ratio for a lower level of disability with tirofiban vs placebo was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.86-1.36). Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 9.7% in the tirofiban group vs 6.4% in the placebo group (difference, 3.3% [95% CI, -0.2% to 6.8%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy, treatment with intravenous tirofiban, compared with placebo, before endovascular therapy resulted in no significant difference in disability severity at 90 days. The findings do not support use of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-17014167.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI