亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: Which is best?*

去甲肾上腺素 医学 内脏循环 肾上腺素 多巴胺 休克(循环) 平均动脉压 麻醉 感染性休克 内脏的 内科学 血压 败血症 心率 血流动力学
作者
Daniel De Backer,Jacques Créteur,Eliézer Silva,Jean‐Louis Vincent
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:31 (6): 1659-1667 被引量:371
标识
DOI:10.1097/01.ccm.0000063045.77339.b6
摘要

Objective To assess the effects of different doses of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in patients with septic shock. Design Prospective, randomized, open-label study. Setting A 31-bed, medicosurgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients Convenience sample of 20 patients with septic shock, separated into two groups according to whether (moderate shock group, n = 10) or not (severe shock, n = 10) dopamine alone was able maintain mean arterial pressure >65 mm Hg. Interventions Dopamine was progressively withdrawn and replaced successively by norepinephrine and then epinephrine (the order of the two agents was randomly determined) to maintain mean arterial pressure constant (moderate shock) or to increase mean arterial pressure above 65 mm Hg (severe shock). Measurements and Main Results Systemic circulation (pulmonary artery catheter) and splanchnic circulation (indocyanine green dilution and hepatic vein catheter) and gastric mucosal Pco2 (gas tonometry) were measured during dopamine (moderate shock only), norepinephrine, and epinephrine administration (both groups). Data were analyzed with nonparametric tests and are presented as median [percentiles 25–75]. In moderate shock, cardiac index was similar to dopamine and norepinephrine (3.1 [2.7–3.8] vs. 2.9 [2.7–4.1] L/min·m2, p = nonsignificant) but greater with epinephrine (4.1 [3.5–4.4]p < .01 vs. dopamine and norepinephrine). Splanchnic blood flow was similar with the three agents (732 [413–1483] vs. 746 [470–1401] vs. 653 [476–1832] mL/min·m, p = nonsignificant). The gradient between mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturations was lower with dopamine than with norepinephrine and epinephrine, but the Pco2 gap was similar with the three agents. In severe shock, cardiac index was higher, but splanchnic blood flow was lower, with epinephrine than with norepinephrine (4.6 [3.7–5.3] vs. 3.4 [3.0–4.1] L/min·m2, p < .01 and 860 [684–1334] vs. 977 [806–1802] mL/min·m2, p < .05, respectively). Epinephrine increased the mixed-venous and hepatic venous oxygen saturation gradient but did not alter Pco2 gap. Conclusions Dopamine and norepinephrine have similar hemodynamic effects, but epinephrine can impair splanchnic circulation in severe septic shock.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
13秒前
15秒前
hmhu完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
sfwrbh发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
hmhu发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
优秀棒棒糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
单薄咖啡豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
2分钟前
xurilaixi发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
烟花应助腼腆的馒头采纳,获得10
2分钟前
herococa应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4分钟前
赘婿应助拼搏冬卉采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
拼搏冬卉完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
拼搏冬卉发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6分钟前
breeze完成签到,获得积分10
6分钟前
nav完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
无限的寄真完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
6分钟前
Andrew发布了新的文献求助30
7分钟前
李健的小迷弟应助guoao采纳,获得10
7分钟前
Andrew发布了新的文献求助10
7分钟前
Andrew完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
月军完成签到,获得积分10
7分钟前
研友_VZG7GZ应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8分钟前
herococa应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8分钟前
8分钟前
guoao发布了新的文献求助10
8分钟前
打打应助D調采纳,获得30
8分钟前
Celia应助徐5V采纳,获得30
8分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10分钟前
herococa应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10分钟前
herococa应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10分钟前
YifanWang应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10分钟前
糟糕的颜完成签到 ,获得积分10
10分钟前
遇上就这样吧应助大道要熬采纳,获得100
10分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rapid Review of Electrodiagnostic and Neuromuscular Medicine: A Must-Have Reference for Neurologists and Physiatrists 1000
求中国石油大学(北京)图书馆的硕士论文,作者董晨,十年前搞太赫兹的 500
Aircraft Engine Design, Third Edition 500
Neonatal and Pediatric ECMO Simulation Scenarios 500
Ricci Solitons in Dimensions 4 and Higher 470
Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research 460
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 内科学 生物化学 物理 计算机科学 纳米技术 遗传学 基因 复合材料 化学工程 物理化学 病理 催化作用 免疫学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4779986
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4109964
关于积分的说明 12713982
捐赠科研通 3832835
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2113970
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1137349
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1022058