Evaluation of the Safety of Intravenous Thiamine Administration in a Large Academic Medical Center

医学 硫胺素 不利影响 四分位间距 入射(几何) 回顾性队列研究 麻醉 外科 内科学 物理 光学
作者
Shelby L. Tjugum,Tanner Hedrick,Stéphanie Jean,Stephanie A. Heeney,Kalynn A. Rohde,Stacy Campbell-Bright
出处
期刊:Journal of Pharmacy Practice [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:34 (3): 397-402 被引量:9
标识
DOI:10.1177/0897190019872584
摘要

Background/Objective: Previous literature describes increased incidence of infusion-related reactions when administering thiamine doses greater than 100 mg as an intravenous (IV) push. The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the safety of administering higher doses of thiamine as IV push compared to infusion. Methods: A single-center, retrospective review was performed from June to October 2017. Included patients were aged 18 years or older and received 1 dose of IV thiamine 200 mg or greater. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 included patients who received 200-mg IV push and, group 2 included patients who received any dose greater than 200 mg. The primary objective was to quantify and compare rate of adverse reactions between the 2 groups. Institutional thiamine prescribing practices were examined. Wilcoxon Rank Sum and Fischer exact tests were performed. Results: Sixty-six percent of patients were male, and the median age was 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 44-63). Fifty percent received 200-mg IV push, 20% received a combination of IV infusion and IV push, and 30% received IV infusion. Adverse reactions possibly due to thiamine administration occurred in 4 (2.0%) patients. One patient received 200 mg via IV infusion, while 3 received 200 mg via IV push. There was no significant difference in adverse reaction rate between IV push and IV infusion administrations ( P = .640). Conclusion: Our results support administering thiamine doses of 200 mg or less as an IV push. Given lack of robust safety data, it is recommended to continue to dilute doses greater than 200 mg and infuse over 30 minutes.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
找不到文献的阿斌完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
4秒前
Lucas应助缪缪拿铁采纳,获得10
4秒前
5秒前
6秒前
快去爬山完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
Orange应助傲寒采纳,获得10
8秒前
Ov5发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
膘签关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
传奇3应助Zengyuan采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
事缓则源发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
碧蓝笑槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
bkagyin应助lilray采纳,获得10
12秒前
李健的小迷弟应助饭团采纳,获得10
13秒前
Tiamo发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
科研通AI6.2应助饭团采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
fly发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Hart发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
luxia完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
王图图发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
膘签发布了新的文献求助50
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
合适的芸遥完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
无理发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
21秒前
科研通AI6.4应助饭团采纳,获得10
22秒前
苹果板凳完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
科研通AI6.4应助饭团采纳,获得10
22秒前
ccc完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
共产主义战士应助饭团采纳,获得10
22秒前
Zengyuan发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7749428
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9297231
关于积分的说明 20239137
捐赠科研通 7330737
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3309168
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460794
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2321427