医学
荟萃分析
相对风险
内科学
益生菌
随机对照试验
子群分析
不利影响
置信区间
人口
儿科
环境卫生
生物
细菌
遗传学
作者
CA Parisinos,JL Ooi,J O Lindsay,G Parkes
出处
期刊:Gut
[BMJ]
日期:2015-06-01
卷期号:64 (Suppl 1): A18.1-A18
标识
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.34
摘要
Introduction
Probiotics are live microorganisms intended to confer a health benefit when consumed,1and have been advocated for the prevention of antibiotic associated diarrhoea (AAD). Older patients are more susceptible to AAD compared to the general adult population. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on probiotic use for the prevention of AAD in this patient group. Method
Two independent reviewers identified and critically appraised randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics from electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE (from date of inception to Jan 2015) for the prevention and treatment of AAD in hospital patients with mean age >60 years. Results
Eleven RCTs met inclusion criteria. The pooled relative risk (RR) in a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis of 11 RCTs, which included 4292 participants, showed a reduction in AAD (RR 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.48 to 0.95; p = 0.02; I2= 64%). Subgroup genus analysis demonstrated a significant risk reduction with only Lactobacillus based probiotics (RR 0.51, CI 0.39 to 0.67, p < 0.00001, I2= 0%). Only 3/11 demonstrated adequate power. Adverse events were reported in only 6/11 RCTs, with no serious events attributed to probiotic use. Conclusion
Pooled results demonstrate that probiotics are associated with a risk reduction in AAD in older inpatients. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that this benefit is derived from Lactobacillus-only probiotics, an attractive candidate for future research. Disclosure of interest
None Declared. Reference
FAO, WHO. Health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria. 2001. ftp://ftp.fao.org/ed/esn/food/probio_report_en.pdf
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI