Prospective Outcome Study of 360 Patients Treated with Liposuction, Lipoabdominoplasty, and Abdominoplasty

腹部成形术 吸脂 医学 患者满意度 外科 生活质量(医疗保健) 前瞻性队列研究 整形外科 护理部
作者
Eric Swanson
出处
期刊:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:129 (4): 965-978 被引量:75
标识
DOI:10.1097/prs.0b013e318244237f
摘要

Background: Patient-reported data, including effects on quality of life, have not been previously prospectively evaluated in liposuction patients, or in abdominoplasty patients treated simultaneously with liposuction. This prospective outcome study was undertaken to evaluate and compare liposuction and abdominoplasty from the patient's perspective. Methods: From 2002 to 2007, in-person interviews were conducted with 360 patients who attended a follow-up appointment at least 1 month after surgery, from a total of 551 consecutive patients treated with ultrasonic liposuction and/or abdominoplasty (response rate, 65.3 percent). Questions were asked in six categories: patient data, indications, recovery, results, complications, and psychological effects. Responses were analyzed in three groups: liposuction alone (n = 219), combined liposuction and abdominoplasty (n = 128), and abdominoplasty alone (n = 13). Results: For most recovery indices, liposuction patients recovered significantly more quickly than lipoabdominoplasty patients (p ≤ 0.01) and had less discomfort (pain ratings, 6.1 of 10 and 7.5 of 10, respectively; p < 0.001). The result ratings for lipoabdominoplasty (9.0 of 10) and abdominoplasty (8.7 of 10) were higher than for liposuction alone (7.8 of 10; p < 0.001). Overall, 85.8 percent of patients reported improved self-esteem and 69.6 percent reported an improved quality of life. Conclusions: Liposuction and abdominoplasty, either alone or in combination, provide high levels of patient satisfaction (88.8 percent overall). The combined procedure is similar in discomfort level to abdominoplasty alone (both 7.5 of 10) and produces the highest level of patient satisfaction (99.2 percent), with 97.6 percent of patients saying they would undergo the operation again and 99.2 percent recommending it to others. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Zzk发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
充电宝应助大白菜小菜农采纳,获得30
1秒前
爽歪歪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Pendulium发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
拉长的问晴完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Wind应助GGG采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
我爱写论文完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
尊敬亦寒发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
喵喵完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
充电宝应助小马采纳,获得10
6秒前
善学以致用应助march采纳,获得10
7秒前
在水一方应助南非的猫采纳,获得10
7秒前
fxx发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
烟花应助Ov5采纳,获得10
8秒前
流行天涯应助乐观小之采纳,获得40
8秒前
8秒前
Zzk完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
elerain完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
落寞依珊应助桀庚采纳,获得20
10秒前
尊敬亦寒完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
大白菜小菜农完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
壁虎君发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
萧羊青发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
YUYUYYU发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
小智0921完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
不羁发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
前扣带回发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小思雅完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
(禁止应助)【重要!!请各位详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Logical form: From GB to Minimalism 5000
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches 5th Edition 2000
Linear and Nonlinear Functional Analysis with Applications, Second Edition 1800
International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Madrid Code) (Regnum Vegetabile) 1500
Stereoelectronic Effects 1000
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 880
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4201104
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3736197
关于积分的说明 11764061
捐赠科研通 3408655
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1870363
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 925980
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 836311