医学
埃罗替尼
吉非替尼
内科学
临床终点
肿瘤科
脑转移
肺癌
随机对照试验
无进展生存期
非小细胞肺癌
转移
癌症
表皮生长因子受体
化疗
A549电池
作者
Yi‐Long Wu,Qing Zhou,Jie Wang,Yan Yu,Ligang Xing,Ying Wang,Ying Cheng,Yueyin Pan,Yun Fan,Jianhua Shi,Guojun Zhang,Jiuwei Cui,Jianying Zhou,Yong Song,Wu Zhuang,Zhiyong Ma,Yanping Hu,Gaofeng Li,Xiaorong Dong,Myung‐Ju Ahn
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.9001
摘要
9001 Background: Patients (pts) with EGFRm + NSCLC have high rates of CNS metastasis, few treatment options, and a poor prognosis. So far there are no solid evidence from head to head phase 3 trials in this setting. The potent EGFR TKI AZD3759 has high blood–brain barrier penetration, preliminary data has shown promising intracranial (IC) and systemic antitumor activity, and a tolerable safety profile. Methods: This was the first phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line AZD3759 with first generation EGFR TKIs specifically in pts with EGFRm + (L858R and/or exon 19Del) NSCLC and CNS metastasis. Adult pts were randomized 1:1 to receive AZD3759 (200 mg twice daily) or first generation EGFR TKIs (the control group, gefitinib 250 mg or erlotinib 150 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST 1.1. Results: Between Feb 1, 2019, and Jan 12, 2021, 439 pts were randomized: 220 to AZD3759 and 219 to the control group. As of July 12, 2022, median follow-up was 20.4 months (mo) for both. Median PFS (95% CI) was significantly superior with AZD3759 vs the control group (9.6 [8.2–9.7] vs 6.9 [6.3–8.0] mo; HR 0.719, 95% CI 0.580–0.893; p=0.0024). The objective response rate (ORR; BICR/RECIST 1.1) was 68.6% for AZD3759 vs 58.4% for the control group ( p=0.027), with a trend toward longer median duration of response (DoR) with AZD3759 (8.2 vs 6.8 mo; p=0.0997). IC PFS, ORR, and DoR with AZD3759 were all superior vs the control group regardless of the assessor or evaluation criteria. The overall survival was immature. The incidence of any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was similar between the two groups (97.7% vs 94.0%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 65.9% (AZD3759) and 18.3% (the control group) of pts. The main TRAEs were skin and subcutaneous tissue events, gastrointestinal system events and abnormal liver function. No new safety signals arose. Conclusions: First-line AZD3759 demonstrated superior systemic and IC antitumor efficacy compared with first generation EGFR TKIs in pts with EGFRm + NSCLC and CNS metastasis. Adverse events were as expected and manageable. IC antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT03653546 . [Table: see text]
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI