拆箱
问责
责备
立方体(代数)
心理学
社会心理学
公共关系
政治学
业务
公共行政
社会学
法学
数学
哲学
语言学
组合数学
标识
DOI:10.1080/14719037.2022.2116092
摘要
Notwithstanding the voluminous studies of accountability, little is known about its internal mechanism and its controversial relationship with blame avoidance. Based on the ‘accountability cube’ model, this study identifies four essential components of accountability: monitoring intensity, discussion quality, reward-based consequences, and punishment-based consequences. It explores the impacts of the four elements and their diverse configurations on bureaucrats’ blame avoidance. Drawing on survey data from Chinese civil servants, this study suggests that sanction-based accountability comprising stringent monitoring and punishment may trigger blame avoidance. Trust-based accountability, which includes high discussion quality and potential rewarding consequences, is more beneficial in containing blame avoidance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI