合并分析
医学
血压
随机对照试验
索引(排版)
荟萃分析
虚弱指数
内科学
心脏病学
临床试验
梅德林
老年学
置信区间
年龄调整
统计分析
患者数据
作者
Yizhen Lyu,Wenming Bian,Yezhou Liu,Yetong Liu,Jiaheng Zhang,Ziang Song,Yamei Liu,Tao Chen,Chao Li
出处
期刊:Hypertension
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2026-03-06
卷期号:83 (6): e26397-e26397
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1161/hypertensionaha.125.26397
摘要
BACKGROUND: Contemporary hypertension guidelines emphasize individualized blood pressure (BP) management, often incorporating age; yet chronological age alone may be insufficient to guide optimal treatment. The frailty index offers a multidimensional measure of biological aging and may better guide BP management. METHODS: We pooled participant-level data from SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) and ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes). The frailty index was calculated using a 31-item Rockwood cumulative-deficit model, with frailty defined as a frailty index >0.21. Participants were also categorized by age (<65 versus ≥65 years). Systolic BP (SBP) time in target range (TTR) was calculated using linear interpolation across 10 mm Hg intervals. Restricted cubic splines and stratified Cox models were used to assess the association between TTR within predefined SBP targets and major adverse cardiovascular events. RESULTS: A total of 19 230 participants were included in the analysis (mean age, 65.2 years; 49.0% women; 68.2% classified as frail). Restricted cubic spline analyses showed a J-shaped relationship between average SBP and major adverse cardiovascular events, with clearer separation by frailty than by age. Among frail individuals, greater time spent within SBP intervals between 110 and 140 mm Hg was associated with lower major adverse cardiovascular event risk (hazard ratios per 10% increase in TTR, 0.92-0.94), whereas among nonfrail individuals, greater time spent below 130 mm Hg was associated with lower risk (hazard ratios per 10% increase in TTR, 0.89-0.98). Age demonstrated limited discrimination. Findings were consistent in separate analyses of SPRINT and ACCORD. CONCLUSIONS: The frailty index, rather than chronological age, more accurately discriminates optimal SBP targets in hypertensive patients, whereas chronological age may remain a more practical tool in resource-limited settings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI