医学
血液透析
透析
置信区间
随机对照试验
相对风险
肾脏疾病
逆概率加权
累积发病率
肾脏替代疗法
入射(几何)
内科学
重症监护医学
移植
绝对风险降低
肾移植
外科
临床试验
风险评估
肾病科
死亡率
标准化死亡率
生存分析
比率
队列研究
需要治疗的数量
作者
Giovanni F. M. Strippoli,Giovanni Tripepi,Bernard Canaud,Stefano Stuard,Franklin W. Maddux,Len A. Usvyat,Paola Carioni,Matteo Savoia,Germaine Wong,Carmine Zoccali
标识
DOI:10.1681/asn.0000001225
摘要
Background: Randomized trials suggest that high-volume post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) may improve survival compared with high-flux hemodialysis (HD), but evidence from routine clinical practice and from regions underrepresented in trials remains limited. Methods: We emulated a target trial comparing HDF with high-flux HD using data from EuCliD®, a multinational registry of dialysis patients treated in eight European countries. Adults receiving thrice-weekly in-center dialysis between 2014 and 2019 were eligible. Follow-up began 91 days after dialysis initiation. Sustained treatment strategies were defined as receipt of the assigned modality for at least 90% of sessions. Inverse probability weighting was used to emulate randomized treatment assignment. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with kidney transplantation treated as a competing event. Results: Among 19,539 eligible patients at day 91, inverse probability weighting created a weighted pseudo-population of 19,758 patients (8,641 HDF; 11,117 HD). During a median follow-up of 16 months (interquartile range 6–32), 4,282 deaths occurred. Hemodiafiltration was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with high-flux HD (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.67–0.77). At 2 years, the weighted cumulative incidence of death was 20.6% in the HDF group and 22.3% in the HD group, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 1.7 percentage points. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses, including analyses accounting for country, competing risks, informative censoring, protocol adherence, and an ITT-like exposure definition. The association was broadly similar across prespecified subgroups, with only a stronger relative benefit observed among patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (interaction p<0.001). Higher delivered convective volumes were associated with greater survival benefit; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously, as higher convective volumes may reflect patient stability and center expertise rather than a causal dose–response relationship. Conclusions: In this large multinational target trial emulation, sustained high-volume post-dilution hemodiafiltration was associated with lower mortality than high-flux hemodialysis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI