Development and Testing of a Five‐Item Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale

老人忧郁量表 医学 萧条(经济学) 金标准(测试) 老年病科 物理疗法 老年学 精神科 内科学 抑郁症状 焦虑 宏观经济学 经济
作者
Trinidad Hoyl,Cathy Alessi,Judith O. Harker,Karen Josephson,Fern M. Pietruszka,Maryanne Koelfgen,James Randy Mervis,L. Jaime Fitten,Laurence Z. Rubenstein
出处
期刊:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [Wiley]
卷期号:47 (7): 873-878 被引量:796
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03848.x
摘要

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the effectiveness of a 5‐item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in screening for depression in a frail community‐dwelling older population. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional study. SETTING: A geriatric outpatient clinic at the Sepulveda VA Medical Center, Sepulveda, California. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 74 frail outpatients (98.6% male, mean age 74.6) enrolled in an ongoing trial. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects had a comprehensive geriatric assessment that included a structured clinical evaluation for depression with geropsychiatric consultation. A 5‐item version of the GDS was created from the 15‐item GDS by selecting the items with the highest Pearson x 1 correlation with clinical diagnosis of depression. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the 15‐item GDS and the new 5‐item scale. RESULTS: Subjects had a mean GDS score of 6.2 (range 0–15). Clinical evaluation found that 46% of subjects were depressed. The depressed and not depressed groups were similar with regard to demographics, mental status, educational level, and number of chronic medical conditions. Using clinical evaluation as the gold standard for depression, the 5‐item GDS (compared with the 15‐item GDS results shown in parentheses) had a sensitivity of. 97 (.94), specificity of. 85 (.83), positive predictive value of. 85 (.82), negative predictive value of. 97 (.94), and accuracy of. 90 (.88) for predicting depression. Significant agreement was found between depression diagnosis and the 5‐item GDS (kappa = 0.81). Multiple other short forms were tested, and are discussed. The mean administration times for the 5‐ and 15‐item GDS were. 9 and 2.7 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5‐item GDS was as effective as the 15‐item GDS for depression screening in this population, with a marked reduction in administration time. If validated elsewhere, it may prove to be a preferred screening test for depression.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bkagyin应助potato采纳,获得10
1秒前
FashionBoy应助迅速听白采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
林柯羽发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Yyid完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
212完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
Akim应助梁正强采纳,获得10
4秒前
可可发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
李爱国应助hualushui采纳,获得10
5秒前
hahaha完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
fancysummer发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Alma发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
EverestZ关注了科研通微信公众号
7秒前
爆米花应助项目采纳,获得10
7秒前
无语的汉堡完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
arniu2008应助icey采纳,获得40
8秒前
jja881发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
10秒前
简单海露应助lll采纳,获得30
11秒前
lhw发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
12秒前
13秒前
科研通AI6.4应助可可采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
bkagyin应助褚蕴采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
hualushui完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
ZO发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
淡定的傲薇应助喷火娃采纳,获得30
17秒前
Cuser完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
HYDROLYSE ACIDE DE QUELQUES DIOXASPIROCYCLANES 1314
Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 4th Edition 800
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7747773
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9296022
关于积分的说明 20233042
捐赠科研通 7329005
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3308675
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2460458
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2320653