Development and Testing of a Five‐Item Version of the Geriatric Depression Scale

老人忧郁量表 医学 萧条(经济学) 金标准(测试) 老年病科 物理疗法 老年学 精神科 内科学 抑郁症状 焦虑 宏观经济学 经济
作者
Trinidad Hoyl,Cathy Alessi,Judith O. Harker,Karen Josephson,Fern M. Pietruszka,Maryanne Koelfgen,James Randy Mervis,L. Jaime Fitten,Laurence Z. Rubenstein
出处
期刊:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society [Wiley]
卷期号:47 (7): 873-878 被引量:796
标识
DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb03848.x
摘要

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the effectiveness of a 5‐item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in screening for depression in a frail community‐dwelling older population. DESIGN: A cross‐sectional study. SETTING: A geriatric outpatient clinic at the Sepulveda VA Medical Center, Sepulveda, California. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 74 frail outpatients (98.6% male, mean age 74.6) enrolled in an ongoing trial. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects had a comprehensive geriatric assessment that included a structured clinical evaluation for depression with geropsychiatric consultation. A 5‐item version of the GDS was created from the 15‐item GDS by selecting the items with the highest Pearson x 1 correlation with clinical diagnosis of depression. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the 15‐item GDS and the new 5‐item scale. RESULTS: Subjects had a mean GDS score of 6.2 (range 0–15). Clinical evaluation found that 46% of subjects were depressed. The depressed and not depressed groups were similar with regard to demographics, mental status, educational level, and number of chronic medical conditions. Using clinical evaluation as the gold standard for depression, the 5‐item GDS (compared with the 15‐item GDS results shown in parentheses) had a sensitivity of. 97 (.94), specificity of. 85 (.83), positive predictive value of. 85 (.82), negative predictive value of. 97 (.94), and accuracy of. 90 (.88) for predicting depression. Significant agreement was found between depression diagnosis and the 5‐item GDS (kappa = 0.81). Multiple other short forms were tested, and are discussed. The mean administration times for the 5‐ and 15‐item GDS were. 9 and 2.7 minutes, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5‐item GDS was as effective as the 15‐item GDS for depression screening in this population, with a marked reduction in administration time. If validated elsewhere, it may prove to be a preferred screening test for depression.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
herpes完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
6秒前
飞儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
原子发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
扣子完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
星辰大海完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
酷炫书芹完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
bob完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
科研狗完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
冷静谷秋完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
tigger完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
22秒前
冷静谷秋发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Reader完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
彭于晏应助可青采纳,获得10
27秒前
害羞的雁易完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
zrssovereign完成签到 ,获得积分20
30秒前
潘啊潘完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
可青完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
amen完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
望向天空的鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
LIU完成签到,获得积分0
36秒前
37秒前
tsuki完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
xuexue321完成签到 ,获得积分10
39秒前
刘师兄吧完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
半夏完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
可青发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
48秒前
DEUX完成签到,获得积分10
48秒前
dinglingling完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
星河完成签到 ,获得积分10
50秒前
st完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
55秒前
Rqbnicsp完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
Ava应助原子采纳,获得10
58秒前
既望完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
pokexuejiao应助arniu2008采纳,获得10
1分钟前
陈鹿华完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
雨辰完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1500
VALIDATION OF THE TAYLOR, ALAMEL AND VPSC MODELS FOR PLASTIC ANISOTROPY MODELING OF SHEET METALS 1000
Geist der Kunst und Kultur 1000
Middleton's Allergy Principles and Practice 10th Edition(Middleton's Allergy 2-Volume Set, 10th Edition) 1000
Resistance Spot Welding Dataset for Automobile Body-in-White Quality Analysis 748
日本現代怪異事典 副読本 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7401439
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9006226
关于积分的说明 19172206
捐赠科研通 7035126
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3231104
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2393408
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2212827