Pain Catastrophizing and Pain-related Emotions

作者
Ruth Ruscheweyh,Frauke Nees,Martin Marziniak,Stefan Evers,Herta Flor,Stefan Knecht
出处
期刊:The Clinical Journal of Pain [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:27 (7): 578-586 被引量:71
标识
DOI:10.1097/ajp.0b013e31820fde1b
摘要

OBJECTIVES: One of the most important determinants of the individual pain experience is pain catastrophizing, reflecting an excessively negative cognitive and emotional orientation toward pain. Its assessment by standard questionnaires, which ask participants to reflect on idiosyncratic past painful experiences, is important. It is currently not known whether different types of pain differently shape pain catastrophizing. Furthermore, as the regulation of emotions changes during the life span, age may affect pain catastrophizing, as well. METHODS: In this study, 134 healthy participants, differentiated into 2 age groups (20 to 40 y and 50 to 70 y), completed the Pain Catastrophizing Scale with reference to their past experiences with 3 common types of day-to-day pain (headache, back pain, dental pain). RESULTS: On average, the different types of pain shared one-third of the variance in pain catastrophizing. Pain-type-specific catastrophizing scores were more strongly related to ratings of sensory and emotional pain characteristics than standard catastrophizing scores. In younger adults, pain catastrophizing was preferentially associated with emotional responses to pain whereas in older adults, it was preferentially associated with pain intensity ratings. DISCUSSION: This study indicates that for day-to-day pain, catastrophizing significantly depends on pain type. The results suggest the use of pain-type-specific instructions for catastrophizing questionnaires because it may lead to better prediction of clinically relevant pain characteristics, such as pain intensity. Furthermore, pain catastrophizing seems to change during the life span, with a higher engagement of emotional versus sensory pain processing in younger compared with older adults.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
LL完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
lidan_2008完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
坦率白萱完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
zhu1230完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
liu123完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wuwuhu完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
xz完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
wendy发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
米多奇完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
认真以云完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lcx完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
blackcat完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Xieyusen发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
CuCd完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
皮皮发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被GoJoy采纳,获得10
5秒前
跳跳熊完成签到,获得积分0
5秒前
圈圈完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
melina完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
CYJ完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Lin-de-傲娇完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
材料虎完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
端庄的罗完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
yty发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被QianQianONE采纳,获得10
6秒前
AirJia完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
liu完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
8秒前
飘零枫叶发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
不知道叫啥完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
RadioMars的应助被小董哥采纳,获得10
8秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea De Guyane 2000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Stochastic Models in Operations Research,Vol. 2 600
Guidelines for fracture-safe and fatigue-reliable design of steel structures 600
Problems and Solutions for Integer and Combinatorial Optimization: Building Skills in Discrete Optimization 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8024714
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9466808
关于积分的说明 21221265
捐赠科研通 7595485
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3387245
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2519921
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2423277