热情
选择(遗传算法)
情绪分析
管理科学
计算机科学
社会学
组织研究
预处理器
数据科学
知识管理
点(几何)
心理学
组织变革
组织行为学
组织分析
决策分析
组织学习
组织生态学
认识论
决策支持系统
决策论
组织绩效
工作(物理)
公共关系
作者
Imran Kadolkar,Divya V Doshi,Scott Tonidandel,José M. Cortina
标识
DOI:10.1177/10944281251408073
摘要
Sentiment analysis (SA) has grown considerably in organizational science research over the past two decades, particularly in the last few years. While enthusiasm for integrating advanced natural language processing algorithms is encouraging, authors are not reaping the benefits of such tools fully. Our systematic review of SA application in the organizational sciences suggests that authors struggle to appreciate all of the decisions that are inherent to SA, the choices that are available at each decision point, and the consequences of each choice. To address this gap, we use a working example to illustrate four critical decision points authors confront when conducting SA, and the subsequent impact different choices can have on one's conclusion. Decision points include selecting the SA method, computing a sentiment score, preprocessing the data, and using an appropriate level of analysis. We conclude with a framework outlining five dimensions (e.g., accuracy, interpretability, computational cost) to guide the selection of an SA approach based on study goals and needs, along with seven recommendations to authors wishing to apply SA.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI