The response of subgroups of patients with schizophrenia to different antipsychotic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 医学 荟萃分析 系统回顾 人口 精神科 梅德林 抗精神病药 随机对照试验 内科学 政治学 环境卫生 法学
作者
Stefan Leucht,Anna Chaimani,Marc Krause,Johannes Schneider‐Thoma,Dongfang Wang,Shimeng Dong,Myrto Samara,Natalie Peter,Maximilian Huhn,Josef Priller,John M. Davis
出处
期刊:The Lancet Psychiatry [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:9 (11): 884-893 被引量:26
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00304-2
摘要

Background As comparatively few trials in subgroups of patients with schizophrenia have been done, clinicians need to know whether they can rely on the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the general population of patients with schizophrenia. We aimed to compare the efficacy and side-effects of antipsychotic drugs in different subgroups. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched reference lists of previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register (from database inception to April 27, 2020), and PubMed (from April 1, 2020 to June 14, 2021). We excluded studies in patients with stable schizophrenia (ie, relapse prevention studies), studies with a high risk of bias, and studies from mainland China due to quality concerns concerning allocation and masking methods. We included single-blind RCTs or better that assessed one or more of 16 second-generation and 18 first-generation antipsychotics in the general population of patients with schizophrenia or in one or more of the subgroups: children and adolescents (age range as defined in the original studies), patients with a first episode, patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, patients with comorbid substance use, patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, or older patients (age range as defined in the original studies). Two authors independently screened the results of the search, retrieved full-text articles, and checked the inclusion criteria. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, all parameters were extracted in duplicate. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms. We compared drug efficacy between subgroups, by sex, schizoaffective disorder versus schizophrenia, and study origin using random-effects, inverse variance meta-analyses and random-effects subgroup tests, and meta-regression. Findings We included 537 RCTs with 76 382 participants, 26 627 (34·9%) women, 49 755 (65·1%) men, mean age 37·3 years (range of means 7·9–80·2; ethnicity data not available). 412 RCTs included patients in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, 42 included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, 25 included children and adolescents, 20 included patients with their first episode, 20 included patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, 13 included patients with comorbid substance use, and 11 included older patients. Of 507 random-effects subgroup tests done, 46 (9%) showed a significant difference (p<0·05) between subgroups, but there was no clear indication as to which drug should be used in which subgroup. Interpretation The effects of antipsychotics in various patient subgroups were usually similar to those in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, but comparably few studies contributed to the subgroups, in particular in terms of side-effects. If the evidence for treatment in a given subgroup is small, guideline makers and clinicians should consider using the results in the much better studied group of the general population of patients with schizophrenia. Funding German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; FKZ 01KG1508)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
wei完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
kaka22完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
冰山一脚尖完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
好狗喵喵叫完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
缥缈岭南完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
ReeseKorba发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
Naodali发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
果果完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
LL完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
小嚣张完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
寻宝发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
linmm应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
17秒前
barry发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
哈基米曼波完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
SBY关闭了SBY文献求助
20秒前
soyio完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
wangbq完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
26秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
26秒前
热情的乐荷完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
熊风完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
甜甜元槐发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
32秒前
毛豆应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
LFY完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
35秒前
领导范儿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
35秒前
XXX发布了新的文献求助20
36秒前
林金花应助背后的巧荷采纳,获得10
36秒前
清爽的阑悦完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
加油发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
认真科研完成签到,获得积分10
40秒前
风中的外套完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
41秒前
theheartbeat完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
毛豆应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
42秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Gründe der Seele:Die Wiener Psychatrie im 20.Jahrhundert 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7271571
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8891938
关于积分的说明 18797398
捐赠科研通 6946161
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3204023
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2376777
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2179817