The response of subgroups of patients with schizophrenia to different antipsychotic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 医学 荟萃分析 系统回顾 人口 精神科 梅德林 抗精神病药 随机对照试验 内科学 环境卫生 政治学 法学
作者
Stefan Leucht,Anna Chaimani,Marc Krause,Johannes Schneider‐Thoma,Dongfang Wang,Shimeng Dong,Myrto Samara,Natalie Peter,Maximilian Huhn,Josef Priller,John M. Davis
出处
期刊:The Lancet Psychiatry [Elsevier]
卷期号:9 (11): 884-893 被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00304-2
摘要

Background As comparatively few trials in subgroups of patients with schizophrenia have been done, clinicians need to know whether they can rely on the results of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the general population of patients with schizophrenia. We aimed to compare the efficacy and side-effects of antipsychotic drugs in different subgroups. Methods In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched reference lists of previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register (from database inception to April 27, 2020), and PubMed (from April 1, 2020 to June 14, 2021). We excluded studies in patients with stable schizophrenia (ie, relapse prevention studies), studies with a high risk of bias, and studies from mainland China due to quality concerns concerning allocation and masking methods. We included single-blind RCTs or better that assessed one or more of 16 second-generation and 18 first-generation antipsychotics in the general population of patients with schizophrenia or in one or more of the subgroups: children and adolescents (age range as defined in the original studies), patients with a first episode, patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, patients with comorbid substance use, patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, or older patients (age range as defined in the original studies). Two authors independently screened the results of the search, retrieved full-text articles, and checked the inclusion criteria. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline, all parameters were extracted in duplicate. The primary outcome was change in overall symptoms. We compared drug efficacy between subgroups, by sex, schizoaffective disorder versus schizophrenia, and study origin using random-effects, inverse variance meta-analyses and random-effects subgroup tests, and meta-regression. Findings We included 537 RCTs with 76 382 participants, 26 627 (34·9%) women, 49 755 (65·1%) men, mean age 37·3 years (range of means 7·9–80·2; ethnicity data not available). 412 RCTs included patients in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, 42 included patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, 25 included children and adolescents, 20 included patients with their first episode, 20 included patients with predominant or prominent negative symptoms, 13 included patients with comorbid substance use, and 11 included older patients. Of 507 random-effects subgroup tests done, 46 (9%) showed a significant difference (p<0·05) between subgroups, but there was no clear indication as to which drug should be used in which subgroup. Interpretation The effects of antipsychotics in various patient subgroups were usually similar to those in the general population of patients with schizophrenia, but comparably few studies contributed to the subgroups, in particular in terms of side-effects. If the evidence for treatment in a given subgroup is small, guideline makers and clinicians should consider using the results in the much better studied group of the general population of patients with schizophrenia. Funding German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung; FKZ 01KG1508)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
万事胜意发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
难过隶完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
阿力完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
2秒前
尹平完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
桐桐应助山间风采纳,获得10
2秒前
Healer完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Doctor.Xie完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小马甲应助无语的道之采纳,获得10
5秒前
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
搜集达人应助朴实剑通采纳,获得10
8秒前
搜集达人应助hgc采纳,获得10
8秒前
adsf完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
11秒前
XBP发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
1090发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
在水一方应助adsf采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
晓巨人发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
楠楠2001发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
香飘飘完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
dafo完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
代杰居然完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
搜集达人应助芒果瑞纳冰采纳,获得10
18秒前
脑洞疼应助1090采纳,获得10
19秒前
今后应助怎么都帅采纳,获得10
20秒前
20秒前
玉玉鼠发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
20秒前
鱼yu发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
忧伤的烨伟完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
引进保护装置的分析评价八七年国外进口线路等保护运行情况介绍 500
Algorithmic Mathematics in Machine Learning 500
Handbook of Innovations in Political Psychology 400
Mapping the Stars: Celebrity, Metonymy, and the Networked Politics of Identity 400
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
《続天台宗全書・史伝1 天台大師伝注釈類》 300
Visceral obesity is associated with clinical and inflammatory features of asthma: A prospective cohort study 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3840267
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3382409
关于积分的说明 10523711
捐赠科研通 3101986
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1708519
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 822527
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 773385