Antecedents and outcomes of work engagement among nursing staff in long‐term care facilities—A systematic review

奇纳 心理信息 梅德林 护理部 系统回顾 斯科普斯 包裹体(矿物) 心理学 医学 心理干预 社会心理学 政治学 法学
作者
Hilde Hovda Midje,Vibeke Narverud Nyborg,Anita Nordsteien,Kjell Ivar Øvergård,Espen Andreas Brembo,Steffen Torp
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.15804
摘要

To determine antecedents and outcomes of work engagement (WE) among nursing staff in long-term care (LTC) using the Job Demand-Resources model.A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis in systematic reviews guideline. A study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022336736).The initial searches were performed in PsycInfo, Medline, Academic Search Premier, CINAHL and Scopus and yielded 3050 unique publications. Updated searches identified another 335 publications. Sixteen studies published from 2010 to 2022 were included.The screening of titles and abstracts, and subsequently full-text publications, was performed blinded by two author teams using the inclusion/exclusion criteria. When needed, a mutual consensus was obtained through discussion within and across the teams. A descriptive and narrative synthesis without a meta-analysis of the included studies was performed.The extent of research on WE in LTC facilities is limited and the factors examined are heterogeneous. Of forty-two unique antecedents and outcomes, only three factors were assessed in three or more studies. Antecedents-in particular job resources-are more commonly examined than outcomes.Existing literature offers scant evidence on antecedents and outcomes of WE among nursing staff in LTC facilities. Social support, learning and development opportunities and person-centred processes are the most examined factors, yet with ambiguous results.Antecedents and outcomes of engagement among nursing staff in LTC facilities have not previously been reviewed systematically. Engagement has been correlated with both more efficient and higher-quality service delivery. Our findings suggest opportunities to improve health and care services by enhancing engagement, whilst at the same time better caring for employees. This study lays the groundwork for more detailed research into the contributing factors and potential results of increasing caregivers' engagement. No patient or public contribution.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Aoiny完成签到,获得积分20
7秒前
MrChew完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
MangoPie完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
xdc完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
咕噜咕噜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
杨杨杨完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
安安完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
xiaoliu完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
gk完成签到,获得积分0
16秒前
peterlzb1234567完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
易槐完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
包容的忆灵完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
眼睛大的莫英完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
shawn发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
在水一方应助醉熏的雪莲采纳,获得10
22秒前
ri_290完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
掬一捧月光完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
简单往事完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
litn完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
33秒前
ATOM完成签到,获得积分20
36秒前
王昕钥完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
weng完成签到,获得积分10
38秒前
38秒前
聪慧曼文应助RT采纳,获得10
40秒前
gdy201424发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
WXF完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
黎黎完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
找找完成签到,获得积分10
41秒前
顺利完成签到 ,获得积分10
42秒前
42秒前
wyhqwd发布了新的文献求助20
43秒前
lianxin完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
研友_n0kjPL完成签到,获得积分0
50秒前
shawn完成签到,获得积分10
50秒前
贺安完成签到 ,获得积分10
53秒前
davyean完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
靓丽的熠彤完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7738991
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9287933
关于积分的说明 20185094
捐赠科研通 7316956
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3306016
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2458519
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2315956