医学
牙科
牙关紧闭
干插座
科克伦图书馆
冠周炎
梅德林
牙痛
智牙
临床试验
随机对照试验
循证牙科学
数据提取
外科
臼齿
替代医学
病理
法学
政治学
作者
Paul Coulthard,Edmund Bailey,Marco Esposito,Susan Furness,Tara Renton,Helen V Worthington
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library
[Elsevier]
日期:2014-07-29
卷期号:7 (7): CD004345-CD004345
被引量:156
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd004345.pub2
摘要
In this 2020 update, we added 27 new studies to the original 35 in the 2014 review. Unfortunately, even with the addition of these studies, we have been unable to draw many meaningful conclusions. The small number of trials evaluating each comparison and reporting our primary outcomes, along with methodological biases in the included trials, means that the body of evidence for each of the nine comparisons evaluated is of low or very low certainty. Participant populations in the trials may not be representative of the general population, or even the population undergoing third molar surgery. Many trials excluded individuals who were not in good health, and several excluded those with active infection or who had deep impactions of their third molars. Consequently, we are unable to make firm recommendations to surgeons to inform their techniques for removal of mandibular third molars. The evidence is uncertain, though we note that there is some limited evidence that placing PRP or PRF in sockets may reduce the incidence of dry socket. The evidence provided in this review may be used as a guide for surgeons when selecting and refining their surgical techniques. Ongoing studies may allow us to provide more definitive conclusions in the future.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI