Permafrost thermal state and active layer thicknesses
have been compared from five different Arctic
field sites as part of the EU 7th framework project
PAGE21. Data has been compiled for the years 2012-
2014 in the following locations: Samoylov and Kytalyk,
both in Siberia, Russia, Zackenberg in northeast
Greenland, Adventdalen in Svalbard, and Abisko in
northern Sweden. These sites were chosen to exemplify
the gradient between sporadic and continuous
permafrost. The investigated ground thermal data
all come from lowland sediment areas, primarily from
ice-wedge polygonal landforms, except in the case of
Abisko, where the permafrost only exits in palsas.
The two Siberian sites have the coldest permafrost,
earliest active layer freeze-back periods, and significant
annual thermal variation in the upper permafrost.
These observations can be explained by the large annual
air temperature amplitude in the region, high
ground ice content, and limited snow cover. Permafrost
temperatures in northeast Greenland are somewhat
warmer than in Siberia, but are cooler than
those of Svalbard. Seasonal air temperature variation
is smaller in northeast Greenland than northern Russia,
and this is reflected in the smaller variation in
seasonal permafrost temperatures in the prior location.
Svalbard permafrost has similar seasonal variability
compared to northeast Greenland, but is warmer overall,
showing the effect of mild winters. The warmest
permafrost was measured at Abisko, where active
layer thawing also occurs the earliest.
Active layer thickness (ALT) measurements from
the five sites, collected via mechanical probing of
CALM sites, reflect site meteorological variability in
addition to differences in active layer material. In
the past few years, only small scale changes in ALT
have been observed (both thinning and thickening).
However, examining the entire data series shows a
general increase in ALT. The permafrost temperature
and ALT data highlight climate as a main driver of
regional permafrost conditions, but also demonstrate
the influence of site specific factors which must be
considered at the landscape scale.