亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Cost-Effectiveness of Cemiplimab Versus Standard of Care in the United States for First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression ≥50%

彭布罗利珠单抗 肺癌 危险系数 医学 肿瘤科 化疗 内科学 癌症 置信区间 免疫疗法
作者
Andreas Kuznik,Caitlin Smare,Chieh-I Chen,Meena Venkatachalam,Sam Keeping,Kokuvi Atsou,Yingxin Xu,Florence Wilson,Patricia Guyot,Keith Syson Chan,Emily Glowienka,Gerasimos Konidaris
出处
期刊:Value in Health [Elsevier BV]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2021.08.009
摘要

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, from a US commercial payer perspective, of cemiplimab versus other first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 expression ≥50%.A 30-year "partitioned survival" model was constructed. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated by applying time-varying hazard ratios from a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Overall survival and progression-free survival were estimated from EMPOWER-Lung 1 (cemiplimab monotherapy vs chemotherapy) and KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 (pembrolizumab monotherapy vs chemotherapy). Drug acquisition costs were based on published 2020 US list prices. A 3% discount rate was applied to life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs. A deterministic analysis was performed on the base case; 1-way sensitivity and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed model and parameter uncertainties.Cemiplimab was associated with increased time in the "preprogression" (13.08 vs 7.90 and 6.08 months) and "postprogression" (47.30 vs 29.49 and 14.78 months) health states versus pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, respectively. Compared with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy, cemiplimab generated 1.00 (95% CI -0.266 to 2.440) and 1.78 (95% CI 0.607-3.20) incremental QALYs, respectively, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $68 254 and $89 219 per QALY for cemiplimab versus pembrolizumab and cemiplimab versus chemotherapy, respectively. The probability of cemiplimab being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 to $150 000 per QALY was 62% to 76% versus pembrolizumab and 56% to 84% versus chemotherapy.Findings suggest that cemiplimab, versus pembrolizumab or versus chemotherapy, is a cost-effective first-line treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with programmed death-ligand 1 expression ≥50%.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
4秒前
sufujun完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
miles完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
36秒前
56秒前
熊猫奇思发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
2分钟前
2分钟前
乐乐应助熊猫奇思采纳,获得10
2分钟前
3分钟前
4分钟前
熊猫奇思发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
熊猫奇思完成签到,获得积分10
4分钟前
丘比特应助Fein_W采纳,获得10
4分钟前
4分钟前
Fein_W发布了新的文献求助10
4分钟前
每天吃土完成签到 ,获得积分10
5分钟前
李志全完成签到 ,获得积分0
5分钟前
活力一斩完成签到 ,获得积分10
6分钟前
神奇CiCi完成签到 ,获得积分10
7分钟前
blenx完成签到,获得积分10
9分钟前
彭于晏应助苗条的一一采纳,获得10
10分钟前
10分钟前
yipmyonphu完成签到,获得积分10
10分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10分钟前
Jasper应助AI占领世界采纳,获得10
10分钟前
gszy1975完成签到,获得积分10
10分钟前
懒得起名字完成签到 ,获得积分10
11分钟前
隐形曼青应助阿米尔采纳,获得10
11分钟前
androabo完成签到,获得积分10
11分钟前
12分钟前
12分钟前
12分钟前
大模型应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
12分钟前
AI占领世界完成签到,获得积分10
12分钟前
lovelife完成签到,获得积分0
12分钟前
王平安完成签到 ,获得积分10
13分钟前
李健的小迷弟应助苹什猫采纳,获得10
13分钟前
Epiphany_wts完成签到,获得积分10
13分钟前
默默无闻完成签到 ,获得积分10
14分钟前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition 510
Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales--Chinese Version 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7252815
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8875006
关于积分的说明 18734155
捐赠科研通 6933192
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3199769
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2374530
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2174430