Estimating Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Evaluation of Existing Risk Scores and Development of a New Risk Score

医学 置信区间 流血 弗雷明翰风险评分 内科学 风险评估 依杜沙班 癌症 大出血 随机对照试验 血栓形成 外科 疾病 拜瑞妥 华法林 心肌梗塞 心房颤动 计算机科学 计算机安全
作者
Maria A. de Winter,Jannick A N Dorresteijn,Walter Ageno,Cihan Ay,Jan Beyer‐Westendorf,Michiel Coppens,Frederikus A. Klok,Farès Moustafa,Nicoletta Riva,Pedro Ruiz‐Artacho,Thomas Vanassche,Mathilde Nijkeuter
出处
期刊:Thrombosis and Haemostasis [Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)]
卷期号:122 (05): 818-829 被引量:73
标识
DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1735251
摘要

BACKGROUND: Bleeding risk is highly relevant for treatment decisions in cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). Several risk scores exist, but have never been validated in patients with CAT and are not recommended for practice. OBJECTIVES: To compare methods of estimating clinically relevant (major and clinically relevant nonmajor) bleeding risk in patients with CAT: (1) existing risk scores for bleeding in venous thromboembolism, (2) pragmatic classification based on cancer type, and (3) new prediction model. METHODS: In a posthoc analysis of the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, a randomized trial comparing edoxaban with dalteparin for treatment of CAT, seven bleeding risk scores were externally validated (ACCP-VTE, HAS-BLED, Hokusai, Kuijer, Martinez, RIETE, and VTE-BLEED). The predictive performance of these scores was compared with a pragmatic classification based on cancer type (gastrointestinal; genitourinary; other) and a newly derived competing risk-adjusted prediction model based on clinical predictors for clinically relevant bleeding within 6 months after CAT diagnosis with nonbleeding-related mortality as the competing event ("CAT-BLEED"). RESULTS: Data of 1,046 patients (149 events) were analyzed. Predictive performance of existing risk scores was poor to moderate (C-statistics: 0.50-0.57; poor calibration). Internal validation of the pragmatic classification and "CAT-BLEED" showed moderate performance (respective C-statistics: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.66, and 0.63; 95% CI 0.58-0.68; good calibration). CONCLUSION: Existing risk scores for bleeding perform poorly after CAT. Pragmatic classification based on cancer type provides marginally better estimates of clinically relevant bleeding risk. Further improvement may be achieved with "CAT-BLEED," but this requires external validation in practice-based settings and with other DOACs and its clinical usefulness is yet to be demonstrated.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
667700完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
yzq是大美女完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
lexiao完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
陈陈完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
tuzi发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
完美世界应助Sirius_Black采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
李健的小迷弟应助云顶采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
戈戈发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Janny发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
南北完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
所所应助星河采纳,获得20
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
愉快的真发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
聪慧芸完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
666666完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
6秒前
专注白昼发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
kb大慈完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
霸气雯发布了新的文献求助20
7秒前
852应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
充电宝应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
7秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
Anonymous应助shawn采纳,获得10
8秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
小二郎应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
乐乐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
星辰大海应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Nature-Inspired Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications 600
Perfectionism in School 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7730941
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9282296
关于积分的说明 20150321
捐赠科研通 7308300
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3303500
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2456412
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2312142