医学
阿格列汀
安慰剂
2型糖尿病
随机对照试验
内科学
2型糖尿病
糖尿病
双盲
内分泌学
病理
替代医学
磷酸西他列汀
作者
Mingtong Xu,Kan Sun,Wenjie Xu,Chuan Wang,Dewen Yan,Shu Li,Li Cong,Yinzhen Pi,Weihong Song,Qing‐Yuan Sun,Rijun Xiao,Weixia Peng,Jianping Wang,Hui Peng,Yawei Zhang,Peng Duan,Meiying Zhang,Jianying Liu,Qingmei Huang,Xuefeng Li
出处
期刊:BMC Medicine
[BioMed Central]
日期:2023-10-09
卷期号:21 (1): 388-388
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12916-023-03089-x
摘要
BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have become firmly established in treatment algorithms and national guidelines for improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).To report the findings from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial, which was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel DPP-4 inhibitor fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM. METHODS: Patients with T2DM were randomized to receive fotagliptin (n = 230), alogliptin (n = 113) or placebo (n = 115) at a 2:1:1 ratio for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment period, followed by an open-label treatment period, making up a total of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was to determine the superiority of fotagliptin over placebo in the change of HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. All serious or significant adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, mean decreases in HbA1c from baseline were -0.70% for fotagliptin, -0.72% for alogliptin and -0.26% for placebo. Estimated mean treatment differences in HbA1c were -0.44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.62% to -0.27%) for fotagliptin versus placebo, and -0.46% (95% CI: -0.67% to -0.26%) for alogliptin versus placebo, and 0.02% (95%CI: -0.16% to 0.19%; upper limit of 95%CI < margin of 0.4%) for fotagliptin versus alogliptin. So fotagliptin was non-inferior to alogliptin. Compared with subjects with placebo (15.5%), significantly more patients with fotagliptin (37.0%) and alogliptin (35.5%) achieved HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment. During the whole 52 weeks of treatment, the overall incidence of hypoglycemia was low for both of the fotagliptin and alogliptin groups (1.0% each). No drug-related serious adverse events were observed in any treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the study demonstrated improvement in glycemic control and a favorable safety profile for fotagliptin in treatment-naive patients with T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrail.gov NCT05782192.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI