Simultaneous Comparisons of 25 Acute Migraine Medications Based on 10 Million Users’ Self-Reported Records From a Smartphone Application

特里普坦 医学 偏头痛 对乙酰氨基酚 优势比 布洛芬 逻辑回归 病历 子群分析 内科学 急诊医学 麻醉 置信区间 药理学
作者
Chia‐Chun Chiang,X. H. Fang,Zsolt Horváth,François Cadiou,Alexandre Urani,Weijie Poh,Hiroto Narimatsu,Yu Cheng,David W. Dodick
出处
期刊:Neurology [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:101 (24): e2560-e2570 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1212/wnl.0000000000207964
摘要

Background and Objectives Many acute treatment options exist for migraine. However, large-scale, head-to-head comparisons of treatment effectiveness from real-world patient experience reports are lacking. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 10,842,795 migraine attack records extracted from an e-diary smartphone application between June 30, 2014, and July 2, 2020. We analyzed 25 acute medications among 7 classes—acetaminophen, nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, combination analgesics, ergots, antiemetics, and opioids. Gepants and ditan were not included in this analysis. Different doses and formulations of each medication, according to the generic names, were combined in this analysis. We used a 2-level nested logistic regression model to analyze the odds ratio (OR) of treatment effectiveness of each medication by adjusting concurrent medications and the covariance within the same user. Subgroup analyses were conducted for users in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Results Our final analysis included 4,777,524 medication-outcome pairs from 3,119,517 migraine attacks among 278,006 users. Triptans (mean OR 4.8), ergots (mean OR 3.02), and antiemetics (mean OR 2.67) were the top 3 classes of medications with the highest effectiveness, followed by opioids (mean OR 2.49), NSAIDs (other than ibuprofen, mean OR 1.94), combination analgesics (acetaminophen/acetylsalicylic acid/caffeine) (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.67–1.71), others (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.47–1.50), and acetaminophen (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.83–0.84), using ibuprofen as the reference. Individual medications with the highest ORs were eletriptan (OR 6.1, 95% CI 6.0–6.3), zolmitriptan (OR 5.7, 95% CI 5.6–5.8), and sumatriptan (OR 5.2, 95% CI 5.2–5.3). The ORs of acetaminophen, NSAIDS, combination analgesics, and opioids were mostly around or less than 1, suggesting similar or lower reported effectiveness compared with ibuprofen. The ORs for 24 medications, except that of acetylsalicylic acid, achieved statistical significance with p < 0.0001, and our nested logistic regression model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.849. Country-specific subgroup analyses revealed similar ORs of each medication and AUC (United States 0.849, United Kingdom 0.864, and Canada 0.842), demonstrating the robustness of our analysis. Discussion Using a big data approach, we analyzed patient-generated real-time records of 10 million migraine attacks and conducted simultaneous head-to-head comparisons of 25 acute migraine medications. Our findings that triptans, ergots, and antiemetics are the most effective classes of medications align with the guideline recommendations and offer generalizable insights to complement clinical practice. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with migraine, selected acute medications (e.g., triptans, ergots, antiemetics) are associated with higher odds of user-rated positive response than ibuprofen.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
L.L发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
WZH完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
鲸鱼发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
天天呼的海角完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
柠檬味电子对儿完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
微雨若,,完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
文闵完成签到,获得积分0
10秒前
烟花应助热心绿竹采纳,获得10
10秒前
pluto完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
L.L完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
汕头凯奇完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
卿沐完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
午马未羊完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
16秒前
占一手发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
天才小能喵完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
文艺金针菇完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
闻闻完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
萌萌大懒虫完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
wuwang完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
杨旸发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
CipherSage应助金珠珠采纳,获得10
23秒前
Jasper应助boyue采纳,获得10
23秒前
cqnuly完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
呃呃发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
Hello应助yyy采纳,获得10
27秒前
苇一完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
星辰大海应助优美舞仙采纳,获得10
28秒前
hxxiii完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
小绵羊发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
qianshu完成签到,获得积分0
30秒前
周周完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
唠叨的冰海完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
35秒前
shinysparrow应助小绵羊采纳,获得10
35秒前
初七完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
Wisdom, Gods and Literature Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert 400
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2391926
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2096657
关于积分的说明 5282036
捐赠科研通 1824220
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 909793
版权声明 559864
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486170