Comparative efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) and concentrated growth factors (CGF) for female pattern hair loss (FPHL): a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial

Background Comparative studies among different autologous platelet concentrate types for FPHL remain lacking.Methods Patients with FPHL (Sinclair gradeII-III) were enrolled and randomized to receive 4 sessions of PRP, i-PRF or CGF treatment at 4-week intervals. The primary endpoint was the inter-group comparison of the non-vellus target area hair count (TAHC)-increase (%) at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included: within-group changes in TAHC from baseline; within-group changes in hair diameter (HD) from baseline and inter-group comparison of HD-increase (%) at 24 weeks; Growth factor concentrations were quantified to explore correlations with efficacy.Results Seventy-four patients completed the study. Post-treatment TAHC increased significantly from baseline in all groups (all p < 0.05). The TAHC-increase(%) was significantly greater in the CGF (27.11 ± 14.80%) and i-PRF (26.54 ± 11.46%) groups compared to the PRP group (14.53 ± 8.65%; p < 0.05), with no significant difference between CGF and i-PRF. Regarding HD increase, all three groups showed improvement, with no statistically significant differences observed among groups (p > 0.05). The i-PRF group showed the lowest adverse event rate. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentration demonstrated a significant positive correlation with the percentage increase in TAHC (r = 0.527, R2=0.278, p < 0.05).Conclusions CGF and i-PRF demonstrated superior efficacy in increasing TAHC in FPHL patients. The i-PRF group had the lowest adverse event rate. VEGF levels may play a potential role in promoting hair growth.