Predictive accuracy of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and monocyte-to-high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio in determining the slow flow/no-reflow phenomenon in patients with non–ST-elevated myocardial infarction

Objective To investigate whether inflammation based scores including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) and monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (MHR) predict the slow flow (SF)/no-reflow (NR) phenomenon comparatively in patients with non–ST-elevated Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods Current study is retrospective designed and includes 426 NSTEMI patients (mean age of 56.8 ± 11.4 years). The patients were grouped into non slow flow/no-reflow and slow flow/no-reflow groups according to postintervention thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade. Results The slow flow/no-reflow group had significantly higher MHR and lower LMR values than the non slow flow/no-reflow group ( P < 0.01 and P < 0.01, respectively). Lower LMR [odds ratio (OR): 0.659, P < 0.01] and higher MHR (OR: 1.174, P = 0.04) were independent predictors of slow flow/no-reflow phenomenon in model 1 and 2 multivariate analyses, respectively. Furthermore, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR: 0.934, P = 0.01; OR: 0.930, P < 0.01), smoking (OR: 2.279, P = 0.03; OR: 2.118, P = 0.04), Syntax score (1.038, P = 0.04; 1.046, P = 0.01) and high thrombus grade (OR: 7.839, P < 0.01; OR: 8.269, P < 0.01), independently predicted the slow flow/no-reflow development in both multivariate analysis models, respectively. The predictive performance of LMR and MHR was not different ( P = 0.88), but both predictive powers were superior to NLR ( P < 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion The MHR and LMR may be useful inflammatory biomarkers for identifying high-risk individuals for the development of slow flow/no reflow in NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI.