Toxicity and outcome of anti-GD2 antibody ch14.18/CHO in front-line, high-risk patients with neuroblastoma: Final results of the phase III immunotherapy randomisation (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN trial).
作者
Ruth Lydia Ladenstein,Ulrike Pöetschger,Juliet C. Gray,Dominique Valteau‐Couanet,Roberto Luksch,Victoria Castel,Isaac Yaniv,Geneviève Laureys,Martin Elliott,Jean Marie Michon,Cormac Owens,Toby N. Trahair,Godfrey Chi Fung Chan,Ellen Ruud,Henrik Schrøeder,Maja Beck Popovic,Evgenia Glogova,Günter Schreier,Hans Loibner,Holger N. Lode
出处
期刊:Journal of Clinical Oncology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins] 日期:2016-05-20卷期号:34 (15_suppl): 10500-10500被引量:19
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.10500
摘要
10500 Background: Dinutuximab (ch14.18/SP2/0) in combination with cytokines (IL2 and GM-CSF) resulted in a survival benefit in high risk neuroblastoma (NB) patients (2y EFS 66%±5%, A.Yu, NEJM, 2010). The role of cytokines in this context remains unclear. We investigated the role of scIL2 for immunotherapy with ch14.18/CHO in a prospective randomized Phase III clinical trial. Methods: 406 high risk NB patient (pts) (stage 4 ≥ 1y; stage 4 < 1y with MYCN amplification (MNA); stage 2,3 0-21y with MNA) were randomized (R2 of HR-NBL1/SIOPEN; APN311-302; EudraCT:2006-001489-17). Pretreatment consisted of high intensity induction followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as well as local therapy. Pts were randomized to receive immunotherapy (IT) of either 100mg/m² ch14.18/CHO (d8-12) as 5 daily 8-hour short term infusions (STI) alone (STI-A) or combined with 6x106IU/m2 scIL2 (d1-5;8-12) (STI-B) for a total of 5 cycles. All patients received 6 cycles of oral 13-cis-RA (160mg/m2,d19-32). Results: We observed 3y EFS and OS rates for 206 pts treated by STI-A of 60±4% and 66±4%. 200 pts treated by STI-B showed 3y EFS and OS rates of 57±4% and 65±4%. The difference between both arms was statistically not significant (NS). A subgroup analysis according to response to induction revealed 3y EFS rates of 68±5% and 65±5% in patients treated in CR with regimen STI-A and STI-B, respectively (NS). The 3y EFS rates in pts with VGPR or PR at the time of randomization were expectedly lower at 46±6% and 53±6% for STI-A and STI-B, respectively (NS). Toxicity analysis indicated a higher rate of early termination in STI-B (44%) compared to STI-A (18%). Lansky performance status of ≤ 30% was found in 17% of STI-A- and 39% STI-B-pts (p < 0.001). CTC-grade 3&4 allergic reactions in STI-A- and STI-B-cohorts were 9% and 20% ( < 0.001). Incidence of capillary leak and CTC-grade 3&4 fever is significantly lower in the STI-A (1% and 14%) compared to the STI-B cohort (9% and 40%). Conclusions: Outcome data of frontline patients treated with ch14.18/CHO are highly encouraging. However, survival and toxicity analysis indicated no benefit of co-treatment with scIL2 in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01704716.