Development and evaluation of a risk assessment tool for the personalized screening of breast cancer in Chinese populations: A prospective cohort study

医学 乳腺癌 列线图 四分位间距 前瞻性队列研究 风险评估 危险系数 队列 癌症 比例危险模型 队列研究 内科学 置信区间 肿瘤科 计算机安全 计算机科学
作者
Juan Zhu,Le Wang,Weiwei Gong,Xue Li,You‐Qing Wang,Chen Zhu,Huizhang Li,Lei Shi,Chen Yang,Lingbin Du
出处
期刊:Cancer [Wiley]
卷期号:130 (S8): 1403-1414 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1002/cncr.35095
摘要

Abstract Introduction Breast cancer is a significant contributor to female mortality, exerting a public health burden worldwide, especially in China, where risk‐prediction models with good discriminating accuracy for breast cancer are still scarce. Methods A multicenter screening cohort study was conducted as part of the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China. Dwellers aged 40–74 years were recruited between 2014 and 2019 and prospectively followed up until June 30, 2021. The entire data set was divided by year of enrollment to develop a prediction model and validate it internally. Multivariate Cox regression was used to ascertain predictors and develop a risk‐prediction model. Model performance at 1, 3, and 5 years was evaluated using the area under the curve, nomogram, and calibration curves and subsequently validated internally. The prediction model incorporates selected factors that are assigned appropriate weights to establish a risk‐scoring algorithm. Guided by the risk score, participants were categorized into low‐, medium‐, and high‐risk groups for breast cancer. The cutoff values were chosen using X‐tile plots. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by categorizing breast cancer risk into the low‐ and high‐risk groups. A decision curve analysis was used to assess the clinical utility of the model. Results Of the 70,520 women enrolled, 447 were diagnosed with breast cancer (median follow‐up, 6.43 [interquartile range, 3.99–7.12] years). The final prediction model included age and education level (high, hazard ratio [HR], 2.01 [95% CI, 1.31–3.09]), menopausal age (≥50 years, 1.34 [1.03–1.75]), previous benign breast disease (1.42 [1.09–1.83]), and reproductive surgery (1.28 [0.97–1.69]). The 1‐year area under the curve was 0.607 in the development set and 0.643 in the validation set. Moderate predictive discrimination and satisfactory calibration were observed for the validation set. The risk predictions demonstrated statistically significant differences between the low‐, medium‐, and high‐risk groups ( p < .001). Compared with the low‐risk group, women in the high‐ and medium‐risk groups posed a 2.17‐fold and 1.62‐fold elevated risk of breast cancer, respectively. Similar results were obtained in the sensitivity analyses. A web‐based calculator was developed to estimate risk stratification for women. Conclusions This study developed and internally validated a risk‐adapted and user‐friendly risk‐prediction model by incorporating easily accessible variables and female factors. The personalized model demonstrated reliable calibration and moderate discriminative ability. Risk‐stratified screening strategies contribute to precisely distinguishing high‐risk individuals from asymptomatic individuals and prioritizing breast cancer screening. Plain Language Summary Breast cancer remains a burden in China. To enhance breast cancer screening, we need to incorporate population stratification in screening. Accurate risk‐prediction models for breast cancer remain scarce in China. We established and validated a risk‐adapted and user‐friendly risk‐prediction model by incorporating routinely available variables along with female factors. Using this risk‐stratified model helps accurately identify high‐risk individuals, which is of significant importance when considering integrating individual risk assessments into mass screening programs for breast cancer. Current clinical breast cancer screening lacks a constructive clinical pathway and guiding recommendations. Our findings can better guide clinicians and health care providers.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
mingpu完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
维成完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zhengmeilin发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
6秒前
123完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
简单灵凡完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
无名完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
六步郎完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
14秒前
Worenxian完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
fl发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
我是老大应助书笙采纳,获得10
18秒前
高贵魂幽完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
19秒前
21秒前
俊逸的香萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
25秒前
pilot完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
zhengmeilin发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
海盗船长完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
2211完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
lwl666完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
ZJF完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
49秒前
石莫言完成签到,获得积分10
51秒前
英姑应助海东南采纳,获得10
51秒前
53秒前
渔舟唱晚发布了新的文献求助10
54秒前
852发布了新的文献求助10
57秒前
画舫完成签到,获得积分10
58秒前
书笙发布了新的文献求助10
58秒前
59秒前
1分钟前
dennisysz发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
酷波er应助aq采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
11uLt7完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
脑洞疼应助书笙采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
ISCN 2024 – An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2024) 3000
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 2000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
105th Edition CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 1600
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3777367
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3322743
关于积分的说明 10211437
捐赠科研通 3038087
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1667060
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 797952
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758103