Outcomes Following Different Thermal Ablation Strategies in Patients with Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases

医学 烧蚀 倾向得分匹配 热烧蚀 烧蚀区 不利影响 回顾性队列研究 外科 射频消融术 微波消融 导管消融 放射科 内科学
作者
Jianming Li,Guangjian Liu,Xiaoyan Xie,Dezhi Zhang,Rongqin Zheng,Hong Yang,Haining Zhong,Guanghai Dai,Jie Yu,Ping Liang
出处
期刊:Radiology [Radiological Society of North America]
卷期号:308 (2) 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1148/radiol.223135
摘要

Background For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), clinical guidelines recommend imaging-guided thermal ablation combined with systemic therapy. However, the optimal thermal ablation strategy remains unclear. Purpose To compare long-term outcomes between patients who underwent upfront ablation or delayed ablation for unresectable CRLM. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with unresectable CRLM (three or fewer lesions; diameter, <3 cm) admitted to one of seven hospitals between October 2009 and December 2020. Upfront ablation was performed 2-4 weeks before the start of systemic therapy, and delayed ablation was performed 2-3 months after the start of systemic therapy. Propensity score matching was applied to adjust for differences in baseline variables between groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary outcome. Overall survival (OS), complications, and adverse events were secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared between groups by using the log-rank test. Results In total, 255 patients who underwent delayed ablation (mean age, 57 years ± 11 [SD]; 184 men [72%]) and 103 patients who underwent upfront ablation (mean age, 56 years ± 12; 72 men [70%]) were included. After propensity score matching (n = 100 in both groups), the 5-year DFS for patients who underwent upfront ablation was better compared with patients who underwent delayed ablation (36% vs 21%; P = .02). For 5-year OS, no evidence of a difference was observed between ablation strategies (delayed ablation, 59% vs upfront ablation, 64%; P = .49). Additionally, no differences were observed between ablation strategies with respect to the rates of ablative complications (delayed ablation, 6% vs upfront ablation, 5%; P = .76) or drug-related adverse events (delayed and upfront ablation both 9%; P = .99). Conclusion In patients with relatively few (three or fewer) and small (<3 cm) unresectable CRLM, upfront thermal ablation combined with adjuvant systemic therapy led to better DFS compared with delayed ablation. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Georgiades in this issue.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
dyfsj完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Lucas应助pengGuo采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
SciGPT应助空蝉采纳,获得10
刚刚
充电宝应助尔立的男人采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
xiang完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
史迪仔完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
沉默的小耳朵完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
爱学习的波哥完成签到,获得积分20
10秒前
眯眯眼的海完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
欢喜的冬菱完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
befine发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
无辜鞋子发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
Akim应助迷人的Jack采纳,获得10
14秒前
想酷发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Fame完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
paradocxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
南晴完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
耿耿完成签到,获得积分20
22秒前
步美关注了科研通微信公众号
24秒前
今后应助gzj采纳,获得10
24秒前
共享精神应助alai采纳,获得10
25秒前
简单发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
26秒前
liyuqing关注了科研通微信公众号
27秒前
28秒前
八轩发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
无辜鞋子完成签到,获得积分20
30秒前
30秒前
小饼干完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
耍酷宝川发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
li发布了新的文献求助30
34秒前
jay完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
S飞完成签到 ,获得积分10
35秒前
zhijiegao完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
高分求助中
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 900
Plesiosaur extinction cycles; events that mark the beginning, middle and end of the Cretaceous 800
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis reveals causal relationships between blood lipids and venous thromboembolism 500
Chinese-English Translation Lexicon Version 3.0 500
Wisdom, Gods and Literature Studies in Assyriology in Honour of W. G. Lambert 400
薩提亞模式團體方案對青年情侶輔導效果之研究 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2392219
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2096830
关于积分的说明 5282903
捐赠科研通 1824416
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 909895
版权声明 559923
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 486236