计量经济学
结果(博弈论)
回归分析
回归
鉴定(生物学)
因果推理
口译(哲学)
控制变量
省略变量偏差
控制(管理)
元回归
统计
因果分析
因果模型
变量
论证(复杂分析)
数学
计算机科学
荟萃分析
数理经济学
人工智能
内科学
生物
医学
植物
生物化学
化学
程序设计语言
作者
Paul Hünermund,Beyers Louw
标识
DOI:10.1177/10944281231219274
摘要
Control variables are included in regression analyses to estimate the causal effect of a treatment on an outcome. In this article, we argue that the estimated effect sizes of controls are unlikely to have a causal interpretation themselves, though. This is because even valid controls are possibly endogenous and represent a combination of several different causal mechanisms operating jointly on the outcome, which is hard to interpret theoretically. Therefore, we recommend refraining from interpreting the marginal effects of controls and focusing on the main variables of interest, for which a plausible identification argument can be established. To prevent erroneous managerial or policy implications, coefficients of control variables should be clearly marked as not having a causal interpretation or omitted from regression tables altogether. Moreover, we advise against using control variable estimates for subsequent theory building and meta-analyses.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI