认识论
批评
结构主义(科学哲学)
哲学
反射(计算机编程)
职位(财务)
现代物理学
理论物理学
物理
法学
经济
财务
政治学
计算机科学
程序设计语言
标识
DOI:10.1080/09672559.2018.1542275
摘要
According to the substantialist, substances should be regarded as the fundamental ontological category. This has been subjected to criticism, recently and notably by Buonomo and Cumpa, drawing on aspects of modern physics. In this vein, I argue that reflection upon the Standard Model of elementary particle physics also undermines the substantialist position. However this does not necessarily clear the way for the factualist. Focusing on Dasgupta’s ‘generalism’ I suggest that although we are not compelled to adopt this stance, it does open the door to the structuralist position that might be viewed as a ‘third way’ between substantialism and factualism.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI