医学
溶栓
门静脉血栓形成
外科
肝硬化
门静脉系统
门静脉
血栓形成
静脉血栓形成
导管
瘘管
放射科
门静脉压
经颈静脉肝内门体分流术
门脉高压
门静脉造影
并发症
静脉
作者
Gaopo Cai,Zhaohui Hua,Peng Xu,Zhouyang Jiao,Hui Cao,Shirui Liu,Jing Yuan,Zhengyu Peng
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631x.2019.04.013
摘要
Objective
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of portal venous thrombolysis by way of TIPS.
Methods
The clinical data of 40 patients with portal venous system thrombosis treated by TIPS at our department from May 2012 to May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 34 cases of via catheter-directed thrombolysis(7 cases by catheter-directed thrombolysis alone and 27 cases by way of TIPS before catheter-directed thrombolysis ), and 6 cases via pharmaco mechanical thrombectomy(AngioJet); the postoperative complications of the two methods were followed up.
Results
The portal vein was opened in all 40 patients, and there were no major complications during the operation. One patient in the catheter-directed thrombolysis group developed acute liver failure after surgery.In the mechanical thrombolysis group, 1 patient was discharged after small intestinal necrosis resection and intestinal fistula reconstruction.After 6-24 months of postoperative follow-up, 6 patients in the group of thrombolysis suffered from shunt canal stricture.
Conclusions
It is a safe and minimally invasive method to treat portal venous system thrombosis through TIPS. Mechanical thrombolysis is more direct and rapid than catheter thrombolysis.
Key words:
Portal vein; Venous thrombosis; Liver cirrhosis
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI