滤泡性淋巴瘤
抗体-药物偶联物
癌症研究
中性粒细胞减少症
淋巴瘤
医学
内科学
药代动力学
癌症
放射免疫疗法
不利影响
药理学
胃肠病学
肿瘤科
免疫学
化疗
抗体
单克隆抗体
作者
Michael Wang,Jacqueline C. Barrientos,Richard R. Furman,Matthew Mei,Paul M. Barr,Michael Y. Choi,Sven de Vos,Avyakta Kallam,Krish Patel,Thomas J. Kipps,Simon Rule,Kate Flanders,Katti Jessen,Hong Ren,Peter Riebling,Patricia Graham,Lydia King,Archie Thurston,Michael Sun,Elizabeth Moreira dos Santos Schmidt,Brian J. Lannutti,David M. Johnson,Langdon L. Miller,Stephen E. Spurgeon
出处
期刊:NEJM evidence
[New England Journal of Medicine]
日期:2021-12-22
卷期号:1 (1)
被引量:45
标识
DOI:10.1056/evidoa2100001
摘要
BACKGROUND: Receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1) is an oncofetal protein present on many cancers. Zilovertamab vedotin (ZV) is an antibody–drug conjugate comprising a monoclonal antibody recognizing extracellular ROR1, a cleavable linker, and the anti-microtubule cytotoxin monomethyl auristatin E. METHODS: In this phase 1, first-in-human, dose-escalation study, we accrued patients with previously treated lymphoid cancers to receive ZV every 3 weeks until the occurrence of cancer progression or unacceptable toxicity had occurred. RESULTS: We enrolled 32 patients with tumor histologies of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) (n=15), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=7), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (n=5), follicular lymphoma (n=3), Richter transformation lymphoma (n=1), or marginal zone lymphoma (n=1). Patients had received a median of four previous drug and/or cellular therapies. Starting dose levels were 0.5 (n=1), 1.0 (n=3), 1.5 (n=3), 2.25 (n=11), and 2.5 (n=14) mg per kg of body weight (mg/kg). Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data documented systemic ZV exposure and exposure-dependent ZV targeting of ROR1 on circulating tumor cells. As expected with an monomethyl auristatin E-containing antibody–drug conjugate, adverse events (AEs) included acute neutropenia and cumulative neuropathy resulting in a recommended ZV dosing regimen of 2.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks. No clinically concerning AEs occurred to suggest ROR1-mediated toxicities or nonspecific ZV binding to normal tissues. ZV induced objective tumor responses in 7 of 15 patients with MCL (47%; 4 partial and 3 complete) and in 3 of 5 patients with DLBCL (60%; 1 partial and 2 complete); objective tumor responses were not observed among patients with other tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated patients, ZV demonstrated no unexpected toxicities and showed evidence of antitumor activity, providing clinical proof of concept for selective targeting of ROR1 as a potential new approach to cancer therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03833180.)