Evaluation of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Management of Fournier’s Gangrene

Introduction Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs), including Fournier's gangrene (FG), are severe polymicrobial bacterial infections characterized by rapidly spreading inflammation and tissue necrosis. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) dressing and conventional dressing in patients with FG. Materials and methods A prospective study was conducted from December 2020 to May 2022, including patients with clinical features suggestive of FG. Patients were divided into two groups: conventional dressing and VAC dressing. Relevant clinical data, including age, duration of hospital stay, wound status, Fournier's gangrene severity index (FGSI) scores, sepsis markers (C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and procalcitonin), and pain assessment, were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results A total of 84 patients were included in the study, with 42 patients in each group. The mean age was 57.48 ± 15.74 years in the conventional dressing group and 50.83 ± 13.95 years in the VAC dressing group. VAC dressing was associated with a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay (8.14 ± 3.13 days) compared to conventional dressing (11.36 ± 4.75 days). The average time taken for wound closure was significantly reduced in the VAC dressing group (63 ± 14.81 days) compared to the conventional dressing group (112.56 ± 13.82 days). FGSI scores showed significant improvement after debridement in both groups, with lower scores in the VAC dressing group at discharge. Sepsis markers such as CRP and serum procalcitonin exhibited a significant decrease after VAC application. Discussion The study demonstrates that VAC therapy is associated with better clinical outcomes in FG, including reduced duration of hospital stay, faster wound closure, improved FGSI scores, decreased sepsis markers, and reduced pain. These findings align with previous studies highlighting the advantages of VAC therapy over conventional dressing methods. Conclusion VAC therapy provides significant benefits in the management of FG, leading to improved clinical outcomes and patient quality of life. It offers advantages such as shorter hospital stays, faster wound closure, and reduced sepsis markers. The application of VAC dressing should be considered a valuable treatment modality for FG.