Evaluation of the anatomic sinus after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) determines the creation of outer area between the cage and the aortic wall named the ‘anatomic sinus’ (Figure 1 A-B). This newly formed space of the sinuses of Valsalva (SOV) might disrupt the physiological currents of Valsalva and contribute to the formation of subclinical leaflets thrombosis (SLT). The evaluation of the root geometry after TAVR is generally performed with multi detector computer tomography (MDCT), and the role of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) needs further validation. Purpose The aim of this study was to test reproducibility of 2D TTE assessment of the anatomic sinus dimension with MDCT as reference. We also investigated predictors for SLT. Methods We enrolled 90 patients who underwent TAVR with self-expandable prosthesis. 2D TTE was performed using Philips EPIQ-7, and echocardiograms analysed offline with Philips QLAB cardiac analysis. Both SOV and prosthesis diameters were assessed in long and short-axis parasternal view (PLAX / PSAX) and the bidimensional area of the anatomic sinus was calculated (Figure 2 A-B). Inter-observer (observer 1 – 2) reproducibility was assessed by the means of interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). MDCT was performed in 50 individuals to evaluate concordance (Bland Altman test) with the 2D TTE anatomic sinus area and also to detect SLT (Figure 2 C-D). Multivariable model was built to assess predictors of SLT. Results Mean follow-up was 13.1 months. There was excellent and good correlation with regard to the diameter of the SOV and the prosthesis measured in PLAX view by observer 1 and 2: ICC: 0.93, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (0.76–0.97), p< 0.001; ICC: 0.87(0.63,0.96), p<0.001, SOV and prosthesis respectively. The correlation found with regard to the diameter of the SOV and the prosthesis measured in PSAX view was also excellent ICC: 0.90(0.68,0.97), p=0.001; and good ICC: 0.88(0.63,0.96), p <0.001, SOV and prosthesis respectively. The anatomic sinus areas assessed by 2D TTE were similar compared to areas derived by MDCT (4.1 ± 1.09 cm2 vs. 4.02 ± 1.55 cm2, respectively, p=0.57). Bland–Altman analysis of anatomic sinus area measured on 2D TTE and MDCT respectively, indicated high level of agreement and no fixed or proportional bias. Native bicuspid valve, but not the anatomic sinus area, was the only independent predictors for SLT. Conclusions Following TAVR, the newly formed anatomic sinus could be assessed with good reproducibility with 2D TTE. We found a significant association between native bicuspid valve and SLT diagnosed with MDCT.Figure 1A-BFigure 2A-D