Is cognitive–behavioural therapy more effective than relaxation therapy in the treatment of anxiety disorders? A meta-analysis

惊恐障碍 焦虑 荟萃分析 恐惧症 放松疗法 放松(心理学) 临床心理学 认知 焦虑症 特异性恐惧症 心理学 恐慌 认知疗法 社交焦虑 认知行为疗法 广泛性焦虑症 恐怖症 医学 精神科 内科学
作者
Jesús Montero‐Marín,Javier García‐Campayo,Alba López-Montoyo,Edurne Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo,Pim Cuijpers
出处
期刊:Psychological Medicine [Cambridge University Press]
卷期号:48 (9): 1427-1436 被引量:32
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0033291717003099
摘要

Abstract Background It is not clear whether relaxation therapies are more or less effective than cognitive and behavioural therapies in the treatment of anxiety. The aims of the present study were to examine the effects of relaxation techniques compared to cognitive and behavioural therapies in reducing anxiety symptoms, and whether they have comparable efficacy across disorders. Method We conducted a meta-analysis of 50 studies (2801 patients) comparing relaxation training with cognitive and behavioural treatments of anxiety. Results The overall effect size (ES) across all anxiety outcomes, with only one combined ES in each study, was g = −0.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.41 to −0.13], favouring cognitive and behavioural therapies (number needed to treat = 6.61). However, no significant difference between relaxation and cognitive and behavioural therapies was found for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and specific phobias (considering social anxiety and specific phobias separately). Heterogeneity was moderate ( I 2 = 52; 95% CI = 33–65). The ES was significantly associated with age ( p < 0.001), hours of cognitive and/or behavioural therapy ( p = 0.015), quality of intervention ( p = 0.007), relaxation treatment format ( p < 0.001) and type of disorder ( p = 0.008), explaining an 82% of variance. Conclusions Relaxation seems to be less effective than cognitive and behavioural therapies in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive–compulsive disorder and it might also be less effective at 1-year follow-up for panic, but there is no evidence that it is less effective for other anxiety disorders.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
科研通AI6.4应助怪僻采纳,获得10
刚刚
gu完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
忧心的傲之关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
尊敬的小刺猬关注了科研通微信公众号
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
搜集达人应助天真亦旋采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
4秒前
xiaokun发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助Magic1987采纳,获得10
4秒前
雨安发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
桐桐应助独特的忆彤采纳,获得10
5秒前
风轻扬发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
朱信姿发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
DW应助怪僻采纳,获得10
6秒前
zz发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
珠婷发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
一三四关注了科研通微信公众号
8秒前
李爱国应助lishaokun查文献采纳,获得10
8秒前
zx发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
沉静冷亦完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
wanci应助哈基米采纳,获得10
10秒前
loii举报二环路的朴宰范求助涉嫌违规
10秒前
三七二一发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
大个应助顺利焦采纳,获得30
11秒前
小Y完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
沉静冷亦关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
13秒前
三十年发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13223456完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
李健的小迷弟应助xiaokun采纳,获得10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4应助怪僻采纳,获得10
13秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1314
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Navigating Normative Orders. Interdisciplinary Perspectives 800
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7737788
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9286950
关于积分的说明 20180921
捐赠科研通 7315571
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3305633
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2457902
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2315351