惊恐障碍
焦虑
荟萃分析
恐惧症
放松疗法
放松(心理学)
临床心理学
认知
焦虑症
特异性恐惧症
心理学
恐慌
认知疗法
社交焦虑
认知行为疗法
广泛性焦虑症
恐怖症
医学
精神科
内科学
作者
Jesús Montero‐Marín,Javier García‐Campayo,Alba López-Montoyo,Edurne Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo,Pim Cuijpers
标识
DOI:10.1017/s0033291717003099
摘要
Abstract Background It is not clear whether relaxation therapies are more or less effective than cognitive and behavioural therapies in the treatment of anxiety. The aims of the present study were to examine the effects of relaxation techniques compared to cognitive and behavioural therapies in reducing anxiety symptoms, and whether they have comparable efficacy across disorders. Method We conducted a meta-analysis of 50 studies (2801 patients) comparing relaxation training with cognitive and behavioural treatments of anxiety. Results The overall effect size (ES) across all anxiety outcomes, with only one combined ES in each study, was g = −0.27 [95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.41 to −0.13], favouring cognitive and behavioural therapies (number needed to treat = 6.61). However, no significant difference between relaxation and cognitive and behavioural therapies was found for generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder and specific phobias (considering social anxiety and specific phobias separately). Heterogeneity was moderate ( I 2 = 52; 95% CI = 33–65). The ES was significantly associated with age ( p < 0.001), hours of cognitive and/or behavioural therapy ( p = 0.015), quality of intervention ( p = 0.007), relaxation treatment format ( p < 0.001) and type of disorder ( p = 0.008), explaining an 82% of variance. Conclusions Relaxation seems to be less effective than cognitive and behavioural therapies in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder, and obsessive–compulsive disorder and it might also be less effective at 1-year follow-up for panic, but there is no evidence that it is less effective for other anxiety disorders.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI