A preliminary coronary computed tomography angiography–based study of perivascular fat attenuation index: relation with epicardial adipose tissue and its distribution over the entire coronary vasculature

To investigate the perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) in association with epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) parameters and its distribution over the entire coronary vasculature in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).Patients with known or suspected CAD who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography from January 1, 2019, to June 1, 2019, were retrospectively included. The perivascular FAI was quantified on four main epicardial coronary arteries and seven coronary segments. Moreover, EAT density and volume were measured.We included 192 consecutive patients (55 without coronary plaque [mean age 46.4 ± 13.2 years, 69.1% male] and 137 with coronary plaque [mean age 57.9 ± 13.0 years, 84.7% male]). EAT density was lower than perivascular FAI in both groups, but they exhibited substantial correlation (- 83.33 ± 4.54 vs. - 78.22 ± 6.52 HU, p < 0.001; r = 0.667 in plaque- patients and - 83.11 ± 4.48 vs. - 77.81 ± 5.63 HU, p < 0.001; r = 0.778 in plaque+ patients). The left main coronary artery had the highest perivascular FAI, followed by the left circumflex artery. The perivascular FAI in proximal segments was significantly higher compared to that in distal segments (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, the presence of plaque did not alter perivascular FAI on the patient or segmental level.The perivascular FAI was significantly higher than EAT density and correlated substantially with EAT density. The perivascular FAI distribution over the entire coronary tree varied and prompted for vessel-specific or segment-specific thresholds to determine abnormal perivascular FAI in practice.• The perivascular FAI correlated well with EAT density and had higher values than EAT density. • The distributions of perivascular FAI differ between coronary vessels or segments; considering segment and vessel confounding factors while conducting a perivascular FAI study is necessary. • No significant difference of perivascular FAI was observed between patients without and with coronary plaque, nor between coronary segments without plaque and those with plaque.