Ability of urovysion FISH analysis to select patients with low- or intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (LI-NMIBC) for decreased surveillance.

283 Background: Recurrent LI-NMIBC is difficult to detect cytologically, requiring frequent cystoscopies. Urovysion's (Abbot Laboratories, Downers Grove, IL) fluorescent in situ hybridization assay (FISH) detects genetic changes associated with LI-NMIBC and may be useful in identifying patients for extended screening intervals. Methods: Charts of 54 consecutive patients with LI-NMIBC who underwent cystoscopy, cytology, and FISH analysis every 3 months for the first year after resection since 2004 were retrospectively identified and reviewed. We analyzed the number of tumors or high-grade cytologies that would have been missed if surveillance cystoscopy, cytology, and FISH analysis had not been done between 3 and 12 months post-resection for patients with a normal cystoscopy, cytology, and FISH analysis at 3 months after initial resection and compared those results to patients with normal cystoscopy, cytology, and abnormal FISH analysis. Results: Mean age of the 54 patients was 67 (range 25–89) and 41 were males. Thirty-nine patients had normal cystoscopy, cytology, and FISH analysis at 3-months follow-up. If no further surveillance was done until 1 year post-resection, 2 low-grade tumors (3 and 7 mm at 7 months post-resection) and 2 incidents of high-grade cytology would have been missed (4 of 39, 10%). Fifteen patients had normal cystoscopy and cytology but abnormal FISH analysis results at 3 months. If no further surveillance had been done until 1 year after resection, 6 tumors (6 of 15, 40%) (5, 8, 3, 3, 9, 2 mm at 5, 6, 6, 7, 9, 10 months post-resection) and no high-grade cytology would have been missed. Overall, statistically fewer patients with normal compared to abnormal FISH analysis at first follow-up developed tumors before 1 year (4 of 39 vs. 6 of 15, p=0.033). Conclusions: FISH analysis can be used to significantly increase our ability to select patients suitable for extended screening intervals. It may be prudent to include FISH analysis at the first post-resection follow-up before selecting patients with LI-NMIBC for an extended screening interval. [Table: see text]