偏爱
监管机构
监管科学
代理(哲学)
偏好诱导
授权
心理学
联合分析
医学教育
医学
应用心理学
计算机科学
政治学
哲学
公共行政
经济
微观经济学
计算机安全
病理
认识论
作者
Douwe Postmus,Maria Mavris,HL Hillege,Tomas Salmonson,Bettina Ryll,Ananda Plate,Isabelle Moulon,H‐G Eichler,Nathalie Bere,Francesco Pignatti
摘要
Currently, patient preference studies are not required to be included in marketing authorization applications to regulatory authorities, and the role and methodology for such studies have not been agreed upon. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) conducted a pilot study to gain experience on how the collection of individual preferences can inform the regulatory review. Using a short online questionnaire, ordinal statements regarding the desirability of different outcomes in the treatment of advanced cancer were elicited from 139 participants (98 regulators, 29 patient or carers, and 12 healthcare professionals). This was followed by face‐to‐face meetings to gather feedback and validate the individual responses. In this article we summarize the EMA pilot study and discuss the role of patient preference studies within the regulatory review. Based on the results, we conclude that our preference elicitation instrument was easy to implement and sufficiently precise to learn about the distribution of the participants' individual preferences.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI