Use of Bristol Stool Form Scale to predict the adequacy of bowel preparation – a prospective study

医学 结肠镜检查 优势比 前瞻性队列研究 肠道准备 内科学 逻辑回归 置信区间 乙状结肠镜检查 胃肠病学 门诊部 结直肠癌 癌症
作者
Ashish Malhotra,Nihar Shah,Joseph DePasquale,Walid Baddoura,Robert Spira,Thomas S. Rector
出处
期刊:Colorectal Disease [Wiley]
卷期号:18 (2): 200-204 被引量:14
标识
DOI:10.1111/codi.13084
摘要

Abstract Aim Inadequate bowel preparation continues to be a substantial problem for colonoscopy. The seven‐point Bristol Stool Form Scale ( BSFS ) has been associated with delayed colonic transit in adults. We evaluated the utility of the BSFS to identify patients more likely to present with an inadequate preparation. Method Two large community‐based academic medical centres in New Jersey, USA , studied a prospective cohort of 411 consecutive patients undergoing outpatient colonoscopy who were prescribed similar bowel preparations. The BSFS and several other study variables were collected by gastroenterology fellows during an outpatient visit prior to scheduling colonoscopy. All colonoscopy examinations were performed in the morning by a gastroenterologist who graded the adequacy of bowel preparation. Inadequate preparation was defined as one resulting in a repeat colonoscopy at a shorter time interval than would generally be recommended based solely on risk factors or pathological findings. The ability of study variables to discriminate those who did or did not have an adequate preparation was summarized by the c ‐statistic. The relationship between variables that provided some discrimination and the probability of an adequate preparation was modelled using logistic regression. Results The mean age of the study sample was 56 ± 8 ( SD ) years and 63% were women. Bowel preparation was adequate in 337 (82%) of the patients. The BSFS ratings ranged from 1 to 7. The score was <3 in 144 (35%) indicating lower gastrointestinal motility. There was a statistically significant association between the score and the probability of an adequate bowel preparation (odds ratio 1.4; 95% confidence interval 1.2–1.7; P < 0.001) and the c ‐statistic was 0.64 (0.58–0.70). Conclusion Use of the BSFS may help identify patients for whom standard bowel preparation most probably will not be adequate.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
海苔完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
感叹完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
zsh发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Rita应助快乐仙人掌采纳,获得20
1秒前
2秒前
田土土发布了新的文献求助20
2秒前
3秒前
今后应助踏实酬海采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
丘比特应助Marco_hxkq采纳,获得10
3秒前
李爱国应助大力的图图采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
xiazhiping完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Zoor发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
7秒前
星星2完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
华仔应助zsj采纳,获得10
8秒前
X1发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
LIYYUE完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
杨心雨发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
英吉利25发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
万能图书馆应助左右采纳,获得10
10秒前
舒适的涑发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助lyp采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
科研通AI6.2应助洗衣机采纳,获得10
11秒前
我是老大应助sss采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
molihuakai应助爱wy采纳,获得10
12秒前
最是牛魔酬宾日完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Ava应助巩志成采纳,获得10
13秒前
Yeyuntian应助pangpang采纳,获得10
13秒前
Ava应助Marco_hxkq采纳,获得10
13秒前
不知道是谁完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
后来者完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Graphene Handbook (2019 Edition) 800
Adhesion Science: Principles & Practice 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
IEST-RP-CC018: Cleanroom Cleaning and Sanitization: Operating and Monitoring Procedures 600
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 600
How to Design, Write and Publish Qualitative Research for Insight and Impact 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6533977
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8327413
关于积分的说明 17837491
捐赠科研通 5635653
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2934188
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1910456
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1769044