磁刺激
双相情感障碍
随机对照试验
临床心理学
心情
梅德林
临床试验
情绪障碍
系统回顾
萧条(经济学)
脑刺激
医学
心理学
神经科学
物理医学与康复
精神科
内科学
刺激
焦虑
政治学
法学
经济
宏观经济学
作者
Gerasimos Konstantinou,Jeanette Hui,Abigail Ortiz,Tyler S. Kaster,Jonathan Downar,Daniel M. Blumberger,Zafiris J. Daskalakis
摘要
Abstract Objectives Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is commonly used in unipolar depression; yet, its evidence in bipolar disorder (BD) is limited. We sought to review the evidence on the use of rTMS across the different stages of BD. Methods MEDLINE database was systematically searched using the PubMed interface following the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), open‐label studies, and case series; (ii) specific evaluation of the treatment outcomes using psychometric scales; (iii) clinical studies in adults; and (iv) articles in the English language. The systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020192788). Results Thirty‐one papers were included in the review. Most studies included participants diagnosed with a bipolar depressive episode ( N = 24), have yielded mixed findings, and have yet to reach a consensus on the most effective rTMS protocol. Few studies examined the effect of rTMS during manic ( N = 5) or mixed episode ( N = 1), or as maintenance treatment ( N = 1). The limited data thus far suggest rTMS to be relatively safe and well tolerated. Small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study designs, patients and control groups recruited, rTMS parameters, and outcome measures are among the most significant limitations to these studies. Conclusion The current data regarding the application of rTMS in BD patients remain limited. More adequately powered sham‐controlled studies are required to verify its efficacy. Large‐scale clinical trials are needed to also determine whether its effects extend to manic and mixed episodes, as well as its role in mood stabilization and amelioration of suicidal behavior.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI