Consumer reactions to professionals who use decision aids

决策辅助工具 感知 心理学 决策分析 营销 知识管理 计算机科学 业务 医学 经济 替代医学 数理经济学 病理 神经科学
作者
Mauricio Palmeira,Gerri Spassova
出处
期刊:European Journal of Marketing [Emerald Publishing Limited]
卷期号:49 (3/4): 302-326 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1108/ejm-07-2013-0390
摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate consumer reactions to professionals who use decision aids to make recommendations. The authors propose that people react negatively to decision aids only when they are used in place of human expert judgment. When used in combination with expert judgment, decision aids are not perceived negatively and may even enhance service evaluations. Design/methodology/approach – Three online experiments are presented. Participants indicated their perceptions regarding the recommendation strategy of professionals and their impressions of these professionals using one of three strategies: one based on expertise only, one based on decision aids only and a combination of the two (hybrid approach). Both within and between-subjects designs were used. Findings – Contrary to previous research that has found a negative reaction to professionals who use decision aids, the authors find that consumers actually appreciate these professionals, as long as the use of decision aids does not replace expert judgment. The authors also find that when people are given the opportunity to compare a pure expert judgment approach with a hybrid approach (decision aid in combination with expert judgment), they prefer the latter. Research limitations/implications – Although findings should extend to various contexts, this research is limited to the three contexts examined and to the type of use of decision aid described. Practical implications – It has significant practical implication, as decision aids have been shown to improve decision accuracy, but previous research had indicated that consumers view these professionals in a negative way. The current research more clearly delineates the situations under which negative reactions are likely to occur and makes recommendations regarding circumstances in which reactions are actually quite positive. Originality/value – Reactions to professionals using decision aids have been investigated outside the marketing literature. However, this is the first work to show that consumers actually have positive reactions to professionals using decision aids, as long as they do not replace expert judgment.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
练习者完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
wlh完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
SYLH应助RoyChen采纳,获得10
1秒前
WANG发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
3秒前
3秒前
上官若男应助肖先生采纳,获得10
4秒前
Xiaoxiao应助任性代曼采纳,获得20
4秒前
5秒前
张怡博完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
A_Caterpillar完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
chever给光亮的依琴的求助进行了留言
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
Q123ba叭发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
学术小白完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
12秒前
甜心发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
无辜澜发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
淡然的落雁完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
狂野东蒽发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
无花果应助研友_LJGoXn采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
顾矜应助惜惜采纳,获得10
14秒前
Jason完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
翟小七发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
单于青荷发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
研友_8KAP5n发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
雪糕完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
ff不吃芹菜完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
莫若舞完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
高分求助中
Chinesen in Europa – Europäer in China: Journalisten, Spione, Studenten 500
Arthur Ewert: A Life for the Comintern 500
China's Relations With Japan 1945-83: The Role of Liao Chengzhi // Kurt Werner Radtke 500
Two Years in Peking 1965-1966: Book 1: Living and Teaching in Mao's China // Reginald Hunt 500
Epigenetic Drug Discovery 500
Hardness Tests and Hardness Number Conversions 300
Knowledge management in the fashion industry 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3816802
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3360159
关于积分的说明 10407045
捐赠科研通 3078172
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1690613
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 813964
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 767910