Consumer reactions to professionals who use decision aids

决策辅助工具 感知 心理学 决策分析 营销 知识管理 计算机科学 业务 医学 经济 病理 数理经济学 神经科学 替代医学
作者
Mauricio Palmeira,Gerri Spassova
出处
期刊:European Journal of Marketing [Emerald Publishing Limited]
卷期号:49 (3/4): 302-326 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1108/ejm-07-2013-0390
摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate consumer reactions to professionals who use decision aids to make recommendations. The authors propose that people react negatively to decision aids only when they are used in place of human expert judgment. When used in combination with expert judgment, decision aids are not perceived negatively and may even enhance service evaluations. Design/methodology/approach – Three online experiments are presented. Participants indicated their perceptions regarding the recommendation strategy of professionals and their impressions of these professionals using one of three strategies: one based on expertise only, one based on decision aids only and a combination of the two (hybrid approach). Both within and between-subjects designs were used. Findings – Contrary to previous research that has found a negative reaction to professionals who use decision aids, the authors find that consumers actually appreciate these professionals, as long as the use of decision aids does not replace expert judgment. The authors also find that when people are given the opportunity to compare a pure expert judgment approach with a hybrid approach (decision aid in combination with expert judgment), they prefer the latter. Research limitations/implications – Although findings should extend to various contexts, this research is limited to the three contexts examined and to the type of use of decision aid described. Practical implications – It has significant practical implication, as decision aids have been shown to improve decision accuracy, but previous research had indicated that consumers view these professionals in a negative way. The current research more clearly delineates the situations under which negative reactions are likely to occur and makes recommendations regarding circumstances in which reactions are actually quite positive. Originality/value – Reactions to professionals using decision aids have been investigated outside the marketing literature. However, this is the first work to show that consumers actually have positive reactions to professionals using decision aids, as long as they do not replace expert judgment.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
典雅映寒完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
芝麻配海带完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
王皮皮完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI6.4应助猫猫侠采纳,获得10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
小二郎应助Milesma采纳,获得10
4秒前
6秒前
Huang3h完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
cdercder应助仁爱的不惜采纳,获得10
6秒前
勤劳的芷天完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
nopumpkin应助今天想要吃饭采纳,获得10
7秒前
嗒嗒发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
姚断天完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
dylaner完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
夏鱼发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
aiming发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
Sledge发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
归尘发布了新的文献求助30
11秒前
奕青完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
FashionBoy应助遇见0608采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
hgf发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
FashionBoy应助谦让的鹏煊采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Arthritis and Related Conditions, An Issue of Orthopedic Clinics 1000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7287971
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8907697
关于积分的说明 18852211
捐赠科研通 6956629
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3208744
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2378638
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2184563