The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS)

医学 普通外科 外科
作者
Mohammad Abu Hilal,Tess M. E. van Ramshorst,Ugo Boggi,Safi Dokmak,Bjørn Edwin,Tobias Keck,Igor Khatkov,Jawad Ahmad,Hani Al Saati,Adnan Alseidi,Juan Santiago Azagra,Bergþór Björnsson,Mehmet Fatih Can,Mathieu D’Hondt,Михаил Ефанов,Francisco Espín Álvarez,Alessandro Esposito,Giovanni Ferrari,Bas Groot Koerkamp,Andrew A. Gumbs
出处
期刊:Annals of Surgery [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:279 (1): 45-57 被引量:88
标识
DOI:10.1097/sla.0000000000006006
摘要

Objective: To develop and update evidence-based and consensus-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic pancreatic surgery. Summary Background Data: Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS), including laparoscopic and robotic surgery, is complex and technically demanding. Minimizing the risk for patients requires stringent, evidence-based guidelines. Since the International Miami Guidelines on MIPS in 2019, new developments and key publications have been reported, necessitating an update. Methods: Evidence-based guidelines on 22 topics in 8 domains were proposed: terminology, indications, patients, procedures, surgical techniques and instrumentation, assessment tools, implementation and training, and artificial intelligence. The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS, September 2022) used the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology to assess the evidence and develop guideline recommendations, the Delphi method to establish consensus on the recommendations among the Expert Committee, and the AGREE II-GRS tool for guideline quality assessment and external validation by a Validation Committee. Results: Overall, 27 European experts, 6 international experts, 22 international Validation Committee members, 11 Jury Committee members, 18 Research Committee members, and 121 registered attendees of the 2-day meeting were involved in the development and validation of the guidelines. In total, 98 recommendations were developed, including 33 on laparoscopic, 34 on robotic, and 31 on general MIPS, covering 22 topics in 8 domains. Out of 98 recommendations, 97 reached at least 80% consensus among the experts and congress attendees, and all recommendations were externally validated by the Validation Committee. Conclusions: The EGUMIPS evidence-based guidelines on laparoscopic and robotic MIPS can be applied in current clinical practice to provide guidance to patients, surgeons, policy-makers, and medical societies.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
hujunqiu发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
Mnipwefjgj311完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
落寞怜雪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
木木完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
氿瑛发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
LYF发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
艾原发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
albertwang完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
罗4完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
NexusExplorer应助lll采纳,获得10
5秒前
天气预报发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
Woo发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
diode发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
777完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
sxyyy发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
毛球小狐狸完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
怡然新之完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
苹果妙之完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
前夜发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助海贵采纳,获得10
8秒前
思源应助大脸猫4811采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
武雨珍完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
酷波er应助超帅鸣凤采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
可爱的函函应助睿籽采纳,获得10
12秒前
Arthur完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
积极的奇异果完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
杨帆完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
ding应助ldp采纳,获得10
13秒前
高胖发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
小宝贝啥也不懂给小宝贝啥也不懂的求助进行了留言
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
彭于晏应助xiaojichipi采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 1581
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 1500
以液相層析串聯質譜法分析糖漿產品中活性雙羰基化合物 / 吳瑋元[撰] = Analysis of reactive dicarbonyl species in syrup products by LC-MS/MS / Wei-Yuan Wu 1000
Lloyd's Register of Shipping's Approach to the Control of Incidents of Brittle Fracture in Ship Structures 800
Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 21. Morphology I. The Skull and Appendicular Locomotor Apparatus of Lepidosauria 600
The Limits of Participatory Action Research: When Does Participatory “Action” Alliance Become Problematic, and How Can You Tell? 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5545545
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4631578
关于积分的说明 14621138
捐赠科研通 4573196
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2507417
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1484163
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1455383