Caffeine dosing regimens in preterm infants with or at risk for apnea of prematurity

医学 早产儿呼吸暂停 支气管肺发育不良 呼吸暂停 随机对照试验 咖啡因 早产儿视网膜病变 儿科 安慰剂 加药 胎龄 麻醉 妊娠期 怀孕 内科学 病理 替代医学 生物 遗传学
作者
Matteo Bruschettini,Petter Brattström,Chiara Russo,Wes Onland,Peter G. Davis,Roger F. Soll
出处
期刊:The Cochrane library [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:2023 (4) 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd013873.pub2
摘要

Very preterm infants often require respiratory support and are therefore exposed to an increased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (chronic lung disease) and later neurodevelopmental disability. Caffeine is widely used to prevent and treat apnea (temporal cessation of breathing) associated with prematurity and facilitate extubation. Though widely recognized dosage regimes have been used for decades, higher doses have been suggested to further improve neonatal outcomes. However, observational studies suggest that higher doses may be associated with harm.To determine the effects of higher versus standard doses of caffeine on mortality and major neurodevelopmental disability in preterm infants with (or at risk of) apnea, or peri-extubation.We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and clinicaltrials.gov in May 2022. The reference lists of relevant articles were also checked to identify additional studies.We included randomized (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cluster-RCTs, comparing high-dose to standard-dose strategies in preterm infants. High-dose strategies were defined as a high-loading dose (more than 20 mg of caffeine citrate/kg) or a high-maintenance dose (more than 10 mg of caffeine citrate/kg/day). Standard-dose strategies were defined as a standard-loading dose (20 mg or less of caffeine citrate/kg) or a standard-maintenance dose (10 mg or less of caffeine citrate/kg/day). We specified three additional comparisons according to the indication for commencing caffeine: 1) prevention trials, i.e. preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks' gestation, who are at risk for apnea; 2) treatment trials, i.e. preterm infants born at less than 37 weeks' gestation, with signs of apnea; 3) extubation trials: preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks' gestation, prior to planned extubation.We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We evaluated treatment effects using a fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for categorical data and mean, standard deviation (SD), and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. MAIN RESULTS: We included seven trials enrolling 894 very preterm infants (reported in Comparison 1, i.e. any indication). Two studies included infants for apnea prevention (Comparison 2), four studies for apnea treatment (Comparison 3) and two for extubation management (Comparison 4); in one study, indication for caffeine administration was both apnea treatment and extubation management (reported in Comparison 1, Comparison 3 and Comparison 4). In the high-dose groups, loading and maintenance caffeine doses ranged from 30 mg/kg to 80 mg/kg, and 12 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg, respectively; in the standard-dose groups, loading and maintenance caffeine doses ranged from 6 mg/kg to 25 mg/kg, and 3 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg, respectively. Two studies had three study groups: infants were randomized in three different doses (two of them matched our definition of high dose and one matched our definition of standard dose); high-dose caffeine and standard-dose caffeine were compared to theophylline administration (the latter is included in a separate review). Six of the seven included studies compared high-loading and high-maintenance dose to standard-loading and standard-maintenance dose, whereas in one study standard-loading dose and high-maintenance dose was compared to standard-loading dose and standard-maintenance dose. High-dose caffeine strategies (administration for any indication) may have little or no effect on mortality prior to hospital discharge (risk ratio (RR) 0.86, 95% confidence of interval (CI) 0.53 to 1.38; risk difference (RD) -0.01, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.03; I² for RR and RD = 0%; 5 studies, 723 participants; low-certainty evidence). Only one study enrolling 74 infants reported major neurodevelopmental disability in children aged three to five years (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.24; RD -0.15, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.13; 46 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported the outcome mortality or major neurodevelopmental disability in children aged 18 to 24 months and 3 to 5 years. Five studies reported bronchopulmonary dysplasia at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.94; RD -0.08, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.02; number needed to benefit (NNTB) = 13; I² for RR and RD = 0%; 723 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). High-dose caffeine strategies may have little or no effect on side effects (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.86 to 3.23; RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.07; I² for RR and RD = 0%; 5 studies, 593 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain for duration of hospital stay (data reported in three studies could not be pooled in meta-analysis because outcomes were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges) and seizures (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.53; RD 0.14, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.36; 1 study, 74 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We identified three ongoing trials conducted in China, Egypt, and New Zealand.High-dose caffeine strategies in preterm infants may have little or no effect on reducing mortality prior to hospital discharge or side effects. We are very uncertain whether high-dose caffeine strategies improves major neurodevelopmental disability, duration of hospital stay or seizures. No studies reported the outcome mortality or major neurodevelopmental disability in children aged 18 to 24 months and 3 to 5 years. High-dose caffeine strategies probably reduce the rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Recently completed and future trials should report long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of children exposed to different caffeine dosing strategies in the neonatal period. Data from extremely preterm infants are needed, as this population is exposed to the highest risk for mortality and morbidity. However, caution is required when administering high doses in the first hours of life, when the risk for intracranial bleeding is highest. Observational studies might provide useful information regarding potential harms of the highest doses.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
直率的鸿完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
xing_xing应助孤独的傲蕾采纳,获得20
4秒前
微义完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
优雅永不过时完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
大力丹秋完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
守夜人完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
文艺稚晴发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
cdercder应助qzaima采纳,获得10
8秒前
寻珠人完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
xyhua925完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
想人陪的毛巾完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
AQ完成签到,获得积分20
11秒前
可爱的函函应助碎叶采纳,获得10
11秒前
11秒前
香蕉觅云应助可乐采纳,获得10
12秒前
丘比特应助要努力鸭采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
闪闪的音响完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
学术共进完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
端庄的奇异果完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
nike胡咧咧发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
muliushang完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
ninao发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
自然的钻石完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
manzhouwang完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
九三完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
西瓜霜完成签到 ,获得积分0
21秒前
周花花发布了新的文献求助30
21秒前
嗡嗡大王完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
爱听歌忆南完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
China Pluperfect I: Epistemology of Past and Outside in Chinese Art 520
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 500
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in Digital Age? Technology, AI Bots, and Psychotherapy after Covid 444
Management and the Arts 310
Teaching Social and Emotional Learning in Physical Education 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7634820
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9208909
关于积分的说明 19750140
捐赠科研通 7202865
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3275133
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2436999
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2272066