Psychotherapies for Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults

荟萃分析 心理信息 梅德林 广泛性焦虑症 随机对照试验 医学 焦虑 精神科 相对风险 置信区间 临床心理学 心理学 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Davide Papola,Clara Miguel,Mariacristina Mazzaglia,Pamela Franco,Federico Tedeschi,Sara A. Romero,Anushka Patel,Giovanni Ostuzzi,Chiara Gastaldon,Eirini Karyotaki,Mathias Harrer,Marianna Purgato,Marit Sijbrandij,Vikram Patel,Toshi A. Furukawa,Pim J. Cuijpers,Corrado Barbui
出处
期刊:JAMA Psychiatry [American Medical Association]
卷期号:81 (3): 250-250 被引量:78
标识
DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3971
摘要

Importance: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders in adults. Psychotherapies are among the most recommended treatments for GAD, but which should be considered as first-line treatment needs to be clarified. Objective: To use a network meta-analysis to examine the short- and long-term associations of different psychotherapies with outcomes of effectiveness and acceptability in adults with GAD. Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to January 1, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies for adults with GAD. Study Selection: RCTs comparing any type of psychotherapy against another or with a control condition for the treatment of adults (≥18 years, both sexes) with a primary diagnosis of GAD were eligible for inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This study followed Cochrane standards for extracting data and assessing data quality and used the PRISMA guideline for reporting. Risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis was used to rate the certainty of evidence for meta-analytical results. Main Outcomes and Measures: Eight psychotherapies were compared against one another and with 2 control conditions. Primary outcomes were severity of GAD symptoms and acceptability of the psychotherapies. Random-effects model pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted. For effectiveness, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled, and for acceptability, relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated. Results: Data from 65 RCTs were included. Effect size estimates on data from 5048 participants (mean [SD], 70.9% [11.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 42.2 [12.5] years) suggested that third-wave cognitive behavior therapies (CBTs) (SMD, -0.76 [95% CI, -1.15 to -0.36]; certainty, moderate), CBT (SMD, -0.74 [95% CI, -1.09 to -0.38]; certainty, moderate), and relaxation therapy (SMD, -0.59 [95% CI, -1.07 to -0.11]; certainty, low) were associated with reduced GAD symptoms vs treatment as usual. Relative risks for all-cause discontinuation (indication of acceptability) signaled no differences compared with treatment as usual for all psychotherapies (eg, relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.64-1.67] for CBT vs treatment as usual). When excluding studies at high risk of bias, relaxation therapy lost its superiority over treatment as usual (SMD, -0.47; 95% CI, -1.18 to 0.23). When considering anxiety severity at 3 to 12 months after completion of the intervention, only CBT remained significantly associated with greater effectiveness than treatment as usual (SMD, -0.60; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.21). Conclusions and Relevance: Given the evidence in this systematic review and network meta-analysis for its associations with both acute and long-term effectiveness, CBT may represent the first-line therapy of GAD. Third-wave CBTs and relaxation therapy were associated with short-term effectiveness and may also be offered.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
端庄的咖啡豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
LYH完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
敝旧的太阳完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
东风完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
舒适一笑完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
栋仔完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
陈陈完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
iss关注了科研通微信公众号
5秒前
是谁还没睡完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
为更伟大的完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
刘振扬完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
xxlan完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
tough_cookie完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
成林完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
GWX完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
shiqi完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
好好完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
罚克由尔完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
gg完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
chi1完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
ghn123456789完成签到,获得积分0
13秒前
nick完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
等待的谷波完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
碧蓝复天发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
害羞只赢的应助被jiangshanshan采纳,获得10
14秒前
陈秀娟发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
momo完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
T_T完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
yj完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
chi2完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
111完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
第一俗人发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
小梨呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
Dellamoffy完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
shi完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
橙神完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
过时的南烟完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Energie-Contracting 1500
Klimaschutzrecht durch den Energiesektor im Mehrebenensystem – Ein Rechtsvergleich 1000
Oncology Clinical Trials: Successful Design, Conduct, and Analysis, Second Edition 800
Sustainable Engineered Micro/Nanofibers and Hybrid Nanocomposites for Environmental Remediation 400
Ecotourism 400
Liquidus diagram and viscosity estimation in pseudo-binary system Li2B6O10–LiF 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8076093
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9494296
关于积分的说明 21378839
捐赠科研通 7644145
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3400011
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2529797
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2438701