Grassroots media are often taken to be "in your face," confrontational, and adversarial.Activist circles and the academy celebrate such media for their authenticity as well as their oppositional stance vis-a-vis mainstream media, a liberation through new technology and new voices.As an ethnographer/videographer teaching in communication, I know that such grassroots media generally are also seen by community organizers, media activists, academics and students, as a vital representation of the diverse voices of ethnic and sexual minorities across the United States.At the same time, I am wary of taking these texts as simple examples of the promises of new, alternative media in the United States.This very championing of alternative and authentic media, as I argue, may overlook their complexity, their negotiations ofform and audience, and their actual uses and impacts.This is not to say that these media cannot be controversial or oppositional; my analysis of one community-based production program since 1993 argues that the story is even more complicated.These