医学
糖尿病
交叉研究
胰腺炎
临床终点
置信区间
胰岛素
内科学
2型糖尿病
连续血糖监测
低血糖
随机对照试验
胃肠病学
内分泌学
血糖性
安慰剂
病理
替代医学
作者
Line Davidsen,Simon Lebech Cichosz,Peter Stæhr,Peter Vestergaard,Asbjørn Mohr Drewes,Filip Krag Knop,Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen,Søren Schou Olesen
摘要
AIMS: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves glycaemic control and reduces hypoglycaemia in type 1 and 2 diabetes, but its role in managing diabetes in chronic pancreatitis is unknown. We aimed to investigate the effect of CGM compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in patients with chronic pancreatitis and insulin-treated diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a randomised, open-label, crossover trial, 30 participants with chronic pancreatitis and insulin-treated diabetes were randomised to 50 days of CGM or SMBG, separated by a 20-day washout period. The primary endpoint was time in level 2 hypoglycaemia (<3.0 mmol/L). Secondary endpoints included additional CGM metrics, HbA1c, daily insulin dose, questionnaires, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants completed the trial (mean age 64.4 ± 8.8 years; 22 men [75.9%]). There was a numerical reduction in time spent in level 2 hypoglycaemia with CGM compared to SMBG (mean difference -0.36%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.78% to 0.06%; p = 0.09). CGM improved time in range (3.9-10.0 mmol/L; mean difference 7.46%, 95% CI 1.67% to 13.25%; p = 0.01), reduced time above range (>10.0 mmol/L; mean difference -6.55%, 95% CI -12.59% to -0.51%; p = 0.04), and reduced time below range (<3.9 mmol/L; mean difference -0.91%, 95% CI -1.79% to -0.03%; p = 0.04) compared to SMBG. No differences were observed for the safety endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic pancreatitis and insulin-treated diabetes, CGM increased time in range and reduced time above and below range. These findings highlight the potential of CGM in improving glycaemic control.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI