斯科普斯
应用心理学
社会心理的
计算机科学
心理学
梅德林
精神科
政治学
法学
作者
Olivier Doutres,Franck Sgard,Jonathan Terroir,Nellie Perrin,Caroline Jolly,Chantal Gauvin,Alessia Negrini
出处
期刊:International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
日期:2020-05-21
卷期号:28 (1): 447-458
被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1080/10803548.2020.1772546
摘要
Objective. This article proposes a comprehensive literature review of past works addressing hearing protection device (HPD) comfort with the aim of identifying the main sources of variability in comfort evaluation. Methods. A literature review of study samples was performed: documents were hand searched and Internet searched using PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Professional, Scopus or Google search engines. While comfort constructs and measurement methods are reviewed for both earplugs and earmuff HPD types, results and analyses are provided for earplugs only. Results. The literature shows that the multiple sources of the perceived comfort measurement variability are related to the complexity of the concept of comfort and to the various physical and psychosocial characteristics of the triad 'environment/person/earplug', which differ from one study to the other. Conclusions. Considering the current state of knowledge and in order to decrease comfort measurements variability, it is advised to: (a) use a multidimensional construct of comfort and derive a comfort index for each comfort dimension;, (b) use exhaustive and valid questionnaires; (c) quantify as many triad characteristics as possible and use them as independent or control variables; (d) assess the quality of the earplug fitting and the attenuation efficiency.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI