Assessment of Undifferentiated Chest Pain in the Emergency Department (ED); an Observational Study of ED Nurse and Doctor ACS Risk Assessment and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

医学 急性冠脉综合征 急诊科 一致性 胸痛 观察研究 急诊医学 急诊分诊台 执业护士 肌钙蛋白 内科学 护理部 医疗保健 心肌梗塞 经济增长 经济
作者
Andrew G. Chapple,Anthony Chuang,Robyn Clark,Matthew Horsfall,Andrew Blyth,D. Chew,Carolyn Astley
出处
期刊:Heart Lung and Circulation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:26: S70-S70
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.061
摘要

Background: Chest pain constitutes a large proportion of Australian emergency department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is required. The aim was to measure accuracy and characteristics of clinicians assessing patients for suspected ACS and associations with outcome. Methods: A sub-analysis on 1,857 patient risk assessments was conducted from a randomised trial, comparing high-sensitivity troponin versus conventional troponin. Each participating nurse and doctor estimated the likelihood of an ACS diagnosis on their patient and recorded their professional characteristics. The primary outcome was nurse versus doctor impression of ACS in association with actual adjudicated ACS diagnosis. Concordance comparisons were conducted. Results: Six hundred and nine clinicians participated and 16% of patients were diagnosed with an ACS. There was no difference in the accuracy of ED nurses compared to doctors (C-statistic: 0.67 vs. 0.68 respectively; p = 0.35). There was minor discordance between nurse and doctor ACS-risk assessment. Nurse specialist qualification was associated with significantly higher accuracy than nurses without (65.4% vs. 55.3% respectively; p < 0.001). Consultant doctors were most accurate 138/186 (74.2%) vs. registrars 248/441 (56%) vs. residents 464/769 (60.3%) p < 0.001. Patients assessed as unlikely ACS versus definite/likely had a shorter median length of stay (4.8 h [iqr.3.2,7.9] v 5.8 h [iqr.4.1,8.0]). Conclusion: Nurses are similar to doctors in their clinical assessments, however both groups are suboptimal. Standard clinical pathways may be required to assist ED doctors and nurses to improve the assessment of suspected ACS in patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
小小完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
CodeCraft应助曲书文采纳,获得10
2秒前
棠真发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
路宽宽发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
perfect发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
洛杉矶嬴政完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
科研小趴菜完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
小小发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
笑笑笑笑发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助佳佳采纳,获得10
6秒前
李健应助佳佳采纳,获得10
6秒前
带你去月球完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
今后应助不想说采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
科研通AI6.4应助仙妮宝贝采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
桐桐应助Fortitude采纳,获得10
10秒前
Orange应助salura采纳,获得10
10秒前
12秒前
盒子应助Stars采纳,获得30
13秒前
王迪应助怕黑的纸鹤采纳,获得10
13秒前
ASH应助gavin采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
Starch_Borderer完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
烂漫的豆芽完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
hyl完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助伍拾柒采纳,获得10
18秒前
Aveclafoi完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
大模型应助笑点低的羞花采纳,获得10
20秒前
21秒前
22秒前
Hello应助忧伤的小天鹅采纳,获得10
22秒前
脑洞疼应助杨冰采纳,获得10
22秒前
科研通AI6.2应助Tina采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
核安全综合知识2024版 500
Photothermal Science and Techniques 500
The Effective Clinical Neurologist 3ed 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7715016
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9270233
关于积分的说明 20080898
捐赠科研通 7291308
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3298316
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2452559
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2305802