Assessment of Undifferentiated Chest Pain in the Emergency Department (ED); an Observational Study of ED Nurse and Doctor ACS Risk Assessment and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

医学 急性冠脉综合征 急诊科 一致性 胸痛 观察研究 急诊医学 急诊分诊台 执业护士 肌钙蛋白 内科学 护理部 医疗保健 心肌梗塞 经济增长 经济
作者
Andrew G. Chapple,Anthony Chuang,Robyn Clark,Matthew Horsfall,Andrew Blyth,D. Chew,Carolyn Astley
出处
期刊:Heart Lung and Circulation [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:26: S70-S70
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.061
摘要

Background: Chest pain constitutes a large proportion of Australian emergency department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is required. The aim was to measure accuracy and characteristics of clinicians assessing patients for suspected ACS and associations with outcome. Methods: A sub-analysis on 1,857 patient risk assessments was conducted from a randomised trial, comparing high-sensitivity troponin versus conventional troponin. Each participating nurse and doctor estimated the likelihood of an ACS diagnosis on their patient and recorded their professional characteristics. The primary outcome was nurse versus doctor impression of ACS in association with actual adjudicated ACS diagnosis. Concordance comparisons were conducted. Results: Six hundred and nine clinicians participated and 16% of patients were diagnosed with an ACS. There was no difference in the accuracy of ED nurses compared to doctors (C-statistic: 0.67 vs. 0.68 respectively; p = 0.35). There was minor discordance between nurse and doctor ACS-risk assessment. Nurse specialist qualification was associated with significantly higher accuracy than nurses without (65.4% vs. 55.3% respectively; p < 0.001). Consultant doctors were most accurate 138/186 (74.2%) vs. registrars 248/441 (56%) vs. residents 464/769 (60.3%) p < 0.001. Patients assessed as unlikely ACS versus definite/likely had a shorter median length of stay (4.8 h [iqr.3.2,7.9] v 5.8 h [iqr.4.1,8.0]). Conclusion: Nurses are similar to doctors in their clinical assessments, however both groups are suboptimal. Standard clinical pathways may be required to assist ED doctors and nurses to improve the assessment of suspected ACS in patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
joey106完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Serena完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
zhc发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
9秒前
时尚的梦曼完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
xxw完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
袋鼠发布了新的文献求助20
12秒前
miaomiao发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
FashionBoy应助要减肥的访旋采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
17秒前
17秒前
陈熹发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
finn发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Gypsy完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
净净子发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
Luffa完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
白开水完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
田様应助bommi采纳,获得10
21秒前
沐沐完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
852应助热情的水杯采纳,获得10
22秒前
23秒前
汉堡包应助yuaaaann采纳,获得10
23秒前
科研通AI2S应助wenfeisun采纳,获得10
25秒前
26秒前
领导范儿应助陈熹采纳,获得10
26秒前
华仔应助小兔子采纳,获得10
27秒前
didi完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
huhaha完成签到,获得积分20
28秒前
29秒前
dreamode完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
不安服饰发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
didi关注了科研通微信公众号
32秒前
lanxinge发布了新的文献求助30
33秒前
prof.zhang发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3780310
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3325580
关于积分的说明 10223667
捐赠科研通 3040766
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668988
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798962
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758648