Assessment of Undifferentiated Chest Pain in the Emergency Department (ED); an Observational Study of ED Nurse and Doctor ACS Risk Assessment and the Impact on Patient Outcomes

医学 急性冠脉综合征 急诊科 一致性 胸痛 观察研究 急诊医学 急诊分诊台 执业护士 肌钙蛋白 内科学 护理部 医疗保健 心肌梗塞 经济增长 经济
作者
Andrew G. Chapple,Anthony Chuang,Robyn Clark,Matthew Horsfall,Andrew Blyth,D. Chew,Carolyn Astley
出处
期刊:Heart Lung and Circulation [Elsevier]
卷期号:26: S70-S70
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.061
摘要

Background: Chest pain constitutes a large proportion of Australian emergency department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is required. The aim was to measure accuracy and characteristics of clinicians assessing patients for suspected ACS and associations with outcome. Methods: A sub-analysis on 1,857 patient risk assessments was conducted from a randomised trial, comparing high-sensitivity troponin versus conventional troponin. Each participating nurse and doctor estimated the likelihood of an ACS diagnosis on their patient and recorded their professional characteristics. The primary outcome was nurse versus doctor impression of ACS in association with actual adjudicated ACS diagnosis. Concordance comparisons were conducted. Results: Six hundred and nine clinicians participated and 16% of patients were diagnosed with an ACS. There was no difference in the accuracy of ED nurses compared to doctors (C-statistic: 0.67 vs. 0.68 respectively; p = 0.35). There was minor discordance between nurse and doctor ACS-risk assessment. Nurse specialist qualification was associated with significantly higher accuracy than nurses without (65.4% vs. 55.3% respectively; p < 0.001). Consultant doctors were most accurate 138/186 (74.2%) vs. registrars 248/441 (56%) vs. residents 464/769 (60.3%) p < 0.001. Patients assessed as unlikely ACS versus definite/likely had a shorter median length of stay (4.8 h [iqr.3.2,7.9] v 5.8 h [iqr.4.1,8.0]). Conclusion: Nurses are similar to doctors in their clinical assessments, however both groups are suboptimal. Standard clinical pathways may be required to assist ED doctors and nurses to improve the assessment of suspected ACS in patients presenting with undifferentiated chest pain department (ED) presentations. Accurate risk assessment to rule out an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
李胖完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
jessie发布了新的文献求助20
1秒前
5433发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
今后应助GQ采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
微笑的青荷完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
7秒前
CZC完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
爱学习的小谭完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
袁xiaokui完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
科研陈发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
炸裂的乌龟完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
烟雨客完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
allah完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
所所应助wenjiahua采纳,获得10
16秒前
乔修亚完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
伶俐的半莲完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
zz完成签到 ,获得积分20
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
韦老虎完成签到,获得积分20
19秒前
自然杀伤细胞完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
21秒前
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
潇洒的布偶完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
脑洞疼应助Lee采纳,获得10
26秒前
逍遥发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
LANER发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
30秒前
30秒前
shinysparrow应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
30秒前
GQ发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
CipherSage应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
30秒前
穆紫应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
31秒前
高分求助中
The three stars each: the Astrolabes and related texts 1120
Electronic Structure Calculations and Structure-Property Relationships on Aromatic Nitro Compounds 500
Revolutions 400
Psychological Warfare Operations at Lower Echelons in the Eighth Army, July 1952 – July 1953 400
宋、元、明、清时期“把/将”字句研究 300
Classroom Discourse Competence 260
我在山東當院長:一位中國大學小官的自白 230
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2438357
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2117866
关于积分的说明 5377255
捐赠科研通 1845964
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 918676
版权声明 561753
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 491361