Effectiveness of Countermovement Jump and Drop Jump on Leg Muscle Power in Young College Athletes: A Comparative Study

作者
Pavana1, Rupesh Prajapati2
出处
期刊:Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy—An International Journal [Institute of Medico-legal Publications Private Limited]
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.37506/ijpot.v14i2.2629
摘要

Background and Purpose: Plyometric [PT] refers to performance of stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) movements that involve a high intensity eccentric contraction immediately after a rapid and powerful concentric contraction. PT have consistently been shown to improve the production of muscle force and power and enhancement of performance. Plyometric training includes in various type of jumps like Drop jump (DJ), countermovement jumps (CMJ), squat jump, alternate-leg bounding especially for lower body. Drop jump and countermovement jump are simple, practical and effective plyometric exercises. When done with proper technique and effort, both results in an increase in lower body power. So, it is important to know which exercises produce the greatest power output or what technique have must be used to induce changes in specific sport actions. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of countermovement jump and drop jump to improve leg muscle power. Method: 30 subjects volunteered to participate. Written informed consent and institutional ethical clearance was obtained. Anthropometric measurements were obtained and subjects were assigned to one of two groups: Group A: DJ training group (n=15) and Group B: CMJ training group (n=15). They performed either DJ or CMJ training three days a week for 6 weeks. The training program included four sets of 5 repetitions DJ (from the height of a 12-inch box) or CMJ exercise. Standing Long Jump Test (SLJT) was used as outcome measure which was performed a day before and following the 6-week training period. Results: Both the groups showed improvement in standing long jump test. The mean±SD of preand post standing jump test of Group A was 68.63±16.64 and 77.80±14.19 respectively and Group B was 65.83±14.61 and 72.43±13.70 respectively. But the mean±SD difference between the group A and group B was 77.80±14.19 and 72.43±13.70 respectively. Conclusion: The results showed there is significant improvement within Group A and Group B(p<0.01) but there is no significant improvement between both groups (p=0.150). Thus,the study concludes DJ and CMJ plyometric are worthwhile training activities for improving leg muscle power in young athletes.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
sujiaoziemo完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
hao发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
披萨不懂馕的心完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
七月流火重新开启了li的文献应助
5秒前
冯冯发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
酷波er的应助被铁锤牛马版采纳,获得10
6秒前
粥粥粥发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
Wellbeing发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
丘比特的应助被专一的鼠标采纳,获得10
7秒前
9秒前
fofo完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
chen发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
thv发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
12秒前
秋风的应助被cfw采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
荣佳雯完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被xixi采纳,获得10
14秒前
体重有点陈先生给体重有点陈先生的求助进行了留言
14秒前
奥利奥发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被gwt采纳,获得30
16秒前
17秒前
哈西力工发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
李爱国的应助被冯冯采纳,获得10
17秒前
18秒前
九丢发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
鸿鲤发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
LQ完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
ixA完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
桐桐的应助被小贵梓采纳,获得10
20秒前
虾饺完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
自動車の空力技術 800
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (GGB), Band 5: Pro–Soz 300
Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart (RGG), 4. Auflage, Band 7: R–S 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 工程类 有机化学 物理 复合材料 生物化学 内科学 细胞生物学 基因 遗传学 免疫学 冶金 光电子学 癌症研究
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7790525
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9328130
关于积分的说明 20421103
捐赠科研通 7380152
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3323122
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2470964
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2339989